Williams David M, Medina Jibby, Wright Desmond, Jones Kate, Gallagher Jennifer E
Research Associate in Oral Health Services Research and Dental Public Health, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK.
Prim Dent Care. 2010 Apr;17(2):53-60. doi: 10.1308/135576110791013884.
Health policy in England is seeking to minimise hospital use and provide access to services in a primary healthcare setting and maximise skill-mix, driven by issues such as cost and access. The aim of this review was to determine the effectiveness of increased use of skill-mix and service transfer within general and oral healthcare. Secondary outcome measures were related to cost, quality, access, health outcomes and satisfaction.
Data sources were the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination DARE, British Nursing Index, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO from 1996 to August 2008. The reference lists of relevant papers were scanned to identify additional studies.
A rapid appraisal of systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials, controlled trials and service evaluations in relation to specialist services, practitioners with a special interest, medical and dental, nursing and dental care professionals, together with evidence of service shifts from secondary to primary care was undertaken.
A total of 206 papers were reviewed. All titles and abstracts of articles and papers found were extracted and validated according to predefined criteria. They were screened for relevance by two researchers, who assessed trial quality and extracted data. Twenty-six papers met the inclusion criteria. The literature demonstrated limited evidence of the cost-effectiveness and health outcomes associated with changes in setting and skill-mix. However, there was evidence of improved access, patient and professional satisfaction.
There is an overwhelming need for well-designed interventions with robust evaluation to examine cost-effectiveness and benefits to patients and the health workforce.
在成本和可及性等问题的推动下,英国的卫生政策旨在尽量减少医院的使用,并提供在初级医疗环境中获得服务的机会,同时最大限度地提高技能组合。本综述的目的是确定在普通和口腔医疗保健中增加技能组合使用和服务转移的有效性。次要结局指标与成本、质量、可及性、健康结局和满意度有关。
数据来源为1996年至2008年8月的Cochrane系统评价数据库、循证医学图书馆DARE、英国护理索引、护理学与健康照护领域数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、医学期刊数据库和心理学文摘数据库。扫描相关论文的参考文献列表以识别其他研究。
对与专科服务、有特殊兴趣的从业者、医学和牙科、护理和牙科护理专业人员相关的系统评价、随机对照试验、对照试验和服务评估进行了快速评估,并收集了从二级医疗向初级医疗服务转移的证据。
共审查了206篇论文。根据预先确定的标准提取并验证了所发现文章和论文的所有标题和摘要。由两名研究人员筛选其相关性,他们评估试验质量并提取数据。26篇论文符合纳入标准。文献表明,关于环境和技能组合变化所带来的成本效益和健康结局的证据有限。然而,有证据表明可及性、患者和专业人员满意度有所提高。
迫切需要精心设计并经过严格评估的干预措施,以检验成本效益以及对患者和卫生人力的益处。