Department of Nursing Education, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
Acad Med. 2010 Apr;85(4):702-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d296c7.
Physicians make subjective visual assessments concerning the race and/or ethnicity of their patients and document these assessments in patient histories every day. Medical students learn this practice through textbooks and the example set by their educators. Although physicians may believe that they are helping their patients, the practice of using visual clues concerning race and/or ethnicity to determine whether a patient is at risk of certain diseases lacks scientific rigor and may put the patient at significant risk of receiving substandard medical care. The authors argue that if the patient's race or ethnicity is of critical importance, the data should be collected through more objective, scientifically rigorous means, such as genetic testing. In this article, the authors call for the widespread transformation of the way medical schools teach tomorrow's physicians about the role of race and ethnicity in taking medical histories, and they challenge physicians to change their current practices.
医生在日常的病史记录中,会根据患者的种族和/或民族特征做出主观的视觉评估,并将这些评估记录在病史中。医学生通过教材和教育者的榜样来学习这种做法。尽管医生可能认为他们在帮助患者,但根据种族和/或民族的视觉线索来判断患者是否有患某些疾病的风险这种做法缺乏科学严谨性,可能使患者面临接受低质量医疗服务的巨大风险。作者认为,如果患者的种族或民族特征至关重要,则应通过更客观、科学严谨的方法(如基因测试)来收集数据。在本文中,作者呼吁广泛改变医学院教授未来医生如何看待种族和民族在病史采集方面的作用的方式,并呼吁医生改变他们当前的做法。