Suppr超能文献

一种使用经验性、不确定推荐来确定医生决策阈值的新方法。

A new method for determining physician decision thresholds using empiric, uncertain recommendations.

机构信息

Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Apr 8;10:20. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The concept of risk thresholds has been studied in medical decision making for over 30 years. During that time, physicians have been shown to be poor at estimating the probabilities required to use this method. To better assess physician risk thresholds and to more closely model medical decision making, we set out to design and test a method that derives thresholds from actual physician treatment recommendations. Such an approach would avoid the need to ask physicians for estimates of patient risk when trying to determine individual thresholds for treatment. Assessments of physician decision making are increasingly relevant as new data are generated from clinical research. For example, recommendations made in the setting of ocular hypertension are of interest as a large clinical trial has identified new risk factors that should be considered by physicians. Precisely how physicians use this new information when making treatment recommendations has not yet been determined.

RESULTS

We derived a new method for estimating treatment thresholds using ordinal logistic regression and tested it by asking ophthalmologists to review cases of ocular hypertension before expressing how likely they would be to recommend treatment. Fifty-eight physicians were recruited from the American Glaucoma Society. Demographic information was collected from the participating physicians and the treatment threshold for each physician was estimated. The method was validated by showing that while treatment thresholds varied over a wide range, the most common values were consistent with the 10-15% 5-year risk of glaucoma suggested by expert opinion and decision analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This method has advantages over prior means of assessing treatment thresholds. It does not require physicians to explicitly estimate patient risk and it allows for uncertainty in the recommendations. These advantages will make it possible to use this method when assessing interventions intended to alter clinical decision making.

摘要

背景

风险阈值的概念在医学决策中已经研究了 30 多年。在此期间,研究表明医生在估计使用该方法所需的概率方面表现不佳。为了更好地评估医生的风险阈值,并更紧密地模拟医学决策,我们着手设计和测试一种从实际医生治疗建议中得出阈值的方法。这种方法将避免在尝试确定个体治疗阈值时需要医生估计患者的风险。随着临床研究产生新的数据,对医生决策的评估变得越来越重要。例如,在眼压升高的情况下做出的建议很有意义,因为一项大型临床试验已经确定了医生应该考虑的新的风险因素。当医生提出治疗建议时,他们究竟如何使用这些新信息尚未确定。

结果

我们使用有序逻辑回归推导了一种新的估计治疗阈值的方法,并通过要求眼科医生在表达他们推荐治疗的可能性之前审查眼压升高的病例来对其进行测试。从美国青光眼协会招募了 58 名医生。从参与的医生那里收集了人口统计学信息,并估计了每位医生的治疗阈值。该方法通过显示治疗阈值在很大范围内变化,但最常见的值与专家意见和决策分析建议的 10-15%的 5 年青光眼风险一致,从而得到了验证。

结论

这种方法在评估治疗阈值方面具有优于以往方法的优势。它不需要医生明确估计患者的风险,并且允许建议存在不确定性。这些优势将使其能够在评估旨在改变临床决策的干预措施时使用该方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b785/2865441/6c8cfa578c7d/1472-6947-10-20-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验