Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜中层厚度和斑块的存在与否可改善对冠心病风险的预测:ARIC(社区动脉粥样硬化风险)研究。

Carotid intima-media thickness and presence or absence of plaque improves prediction of coronary heart disease risk: the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) study.

机构信息

Section of Atherosclerosis and Vascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Apr 13;55(15):1600-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.075.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated whether carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and the presence or absence of plaque improved coronary heart disease (CHD) risk prediction when added to traditional risk factors (TRF).

BACKGROUND

Traditional CHD risk prediction schemes need further improvement as the majority of the CHD events occur in the "low" and "intermediate" risk groups. On an ultrasound scan, CIMT and presence of plaque are associated with CHD, and therefore could potentially help improve CHD risk prediction.

METHODS

Risk prediction models (overall, and in men and women) considered included TRF only, TRF plus CIMT, TRF plus plaque, and TRF plus CIMT plus plaque. Model predictivity was determined by calculating the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) adjusted for optimism. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate 10-year CHD risk for each model, and the number of subjects reclassified was determined. Observed events were compared with expected events, and the net reclassification index was calculated.

RESULTS

Of 13,145 eligible subjects (5,682 men, 7,463 women), approximately 23% were reclassified by adding CIMT plus plaque information. Overall, the CIMT plus TRF plus plaque model provided the most improvement in AUC, which increased from 0.742 (TRF only) to 0.755 (95% confidence interval for the difference in adjusted AUC: 0.008 to 0.017) in the overall sample. Similarly, the CIMT plus TRF plus plaque model had the best net reclassification index of 9.9% in the overall population. Sex-specific analyses are presented in the manuscript.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding plaque and CIMT to TRF improves CHD risk prediction in the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) study.

摘要

目的

我们评估了在加入传统危险因素 (TRF) 后,颈动脉内膜中层厚度 (CIMT) 和斑块的存在是否能改善冠心病 (CHD) 的风险预测。

背景

传统的 CHD 风险预测方案需要进一步改进,因为大多数 CHD 事件发生在“低”和“中”风险组。在超声扫描中,CIMT 和斑块的存在与 CHD 相关,因此可能有助于改善 CHD 风险预测。

方法

风险预测模型(总体模型以及男性和女性模型)仅考虑了 TRF、TRF 加 CIMT、TRF 加斑块以及 TRF 加 CIMT 加斑块。通过计算调整后乐观偏差的接收者操作特征曲线 (ROC) 下面积来确定模型的预测性。使用 Cox 比例风险模型来估计每个模型的 10 年 CHD 风险,并确定重新分类的人数。观察到的事件与预期事件进行比较,并计算净重新分类指数。

结果

在 13145 名合格受试者中(5682 名男性,7463 名女性),约 23%的受试者通过加入 CIMT 加斑块信息被重新分类。总体而言,CIMT 加 TRF 加斑块模型在 AUC 方面提供了最大的改善,从仅 TRF 的 0.742 增加到整体样本的 0.755(调整后 AUC 差值的 95%置信区间:0.008 至 0.017)。同样,CIMT 加 TRF 加斑块模型在总体人群中的净重新分类指数最佳,为 9.9%。本文介绍了性别特异性分析。

结论

在 ARIC(社区动脉粥样硬化风险)研究中,将斑块和 CIMT 添加到 TRF 中可改善 CHD 风险预测。

相似文献

3
Standard deviation of carotid young's modulus and presence or absence of plaque improves prediction of coronary heart disease risk.
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2017 Nov;37(6):682-687. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12359. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
8
Carotid intima-media thickness in plaque-free site, carotid plaques and coronary heart disease risk prediction in older adults. The Three-City Study.
Atherosclerosis. 2011 Dec;219(2):917-24. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.09.024. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
9
Common carotid intima-media thickness in cardiovascular risk stratification of older people: the Rotterdam Study.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012 Aug;19(4):698-705. doi: 10.1177/1741826711414623. Epub 2011 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

5
ICEBERG-3: carotid plaque score combined with the stress echo improves 5-year major adverse cardiovascular events risk prediction.
Eur Heart J Open. 2025 Jun 2;5(3):oeaf065. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf065. eCollection 2025 May.
8
The heart of the matter: modeling HIV-associated cardiovascular comorbidities in nonhuman primate models.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Apr 22;15:1556315. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1556315. eCollection 2025.
10
Frontiers in subclinical atherosclerosis and the latest in early life preventive cardiology.
Singapore Med J. 2025 Mar 1;66(3):141-146. doi: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2024-169. Epub 2025 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

2
Criteria for evaluation of novel markers of cardiovascular risk: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.
Circulation. 2009 May 5;119(17):2408-16. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192278. Epub 2009 Apr 13.
4
"Risky business": ten years is not a lifetime.
Circulation. 2009 Jan 27;119(3):362-4. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.830281.
6
Limitations of the Framingham risk score are now much clearer.
Prev Med. 2009 Feb;48(2):115-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.12.002. Epub 2008 Dec 14.
7
C-reactive protein and parental history improve global cardiovascular risk prediction: the Reynolds Risk Score for men.
Circulation. 2008 Nov 25;118(22):2243-51, 4p following 2251. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.814251. Epub 2008 Nov 9.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验