California Department of Public Health, California Tobacco Control Program, PO Box 997377, MS 7206, Sacramento, California 95899-7377, USA.
Tob Control. 2010 Apr;19 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i16-20. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.030718.
Since the passage of Proposition 99, California's comprehensive tobacco control programme has benefited from a localised policy adoption process that allows for the innovation and diffusion of strong local tobacco control policies throughout the state.
The policy adoption continuum is described in the context of California's smoke-free workplace movement, and the influence of policy-driven tobacco control initiatives on social norms, behaviour and the public's health was examined.
The Smoke-free California policy adoption continuum reflects a general approach for policy innovation and diffusion that builds social acceptance and influences social norms, while minimising unintended consequences and creating best practices in tobacco control. California's local smoke-free workplace policies have reduced secondhand smoke exposure and supported attitude and behaviour changes. The effects of local policy adoption led to the nation's first statewide smoke-free workplace law.
Proposition 99 created an unprecedented tobacco control infrastructure that supported local policy innovation and diffusion to influence social norms and behaviours. Tobacco control policy efforts should address campaign challenges, oppose pre-emption and confront tobacco industry influence. Advocates must be cautious of pursuing a statewide policy prematurely, as it may result in a weak and/or pre-emptive policy that can stymie local policy efforts and prolong the adoption of a meaningful statewide policy.
自 Proposition 99 通过以来,加州全面的烟草控制计划得益于本地化的政策采纳过程,该过程允许在全州范围内创新和推广强有力的地方烟草控制政策。
在加州无烟工作场所运动的背景下描述了政策采纳连续体,并研究了政策驱动的烟草控制举措对社会规范、行为和公众健康的影响。
无烟加州政策采纳连续体反映了一种用于政策创新和推广的通用方法,它建立了社会认可并影响社会规范,同时最小化了意外后果并在烟草控制方面创造了最佳实践。加州的地方性无烟工作场所政策减少了二手烟暴露,并支持了态度和行为的改变。地方政策采纳的影响导致了全国第一个全州范围的无烟工作场所法律。
Proposition 99 建立了一个前所未有的烟草控制基础设施,支持地方政策创新和推广,以影响社会规范和行为。烟草控制政策努力应解决运动挑战,反对预先阻止,并应对烟草业的影响。倡导者必须谨慎地过早推行全州范围的政策,因为这可能导致一项薄弱和/或预先阻止的政策,从而阻碍地方政策努力,并延长有意义的全州范围政策的采纳。