Ayotte Brian J, Kressin Nancy R
Center for Organizational, Leadership, and Management Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Aug;25(8):814-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1324-y. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
Race differences in the receipt of invasive cardiac procedures are well-documented but the etiology remains poorly understood.
We examined how social contextual variables were related to race differences in the likelihood of receiving cardiac catheterization in a sample of veterans who were recommended to undergo the procedure by a physician.
Prospective observational cohort study.
A subsample from a study examining race disparities in cardiac catheterization of 48 Black/African American and 189 White veterans who were recommended by a physician to undergo cardiac catheterization.
We assessed social contextual variables (e.g., knowing somebody who had the procedure, being encouraged by family or friends), clinical variables (e.g., hypertension, maximal medical therapy), and if participants received cardiac catheterization at any point during the study.
Blacks/African Americans were less likely to undergo cardiac catheterization compared to Whites even after controlling for age, education, and clinical variables (OR = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.13, 0.75). After controlling for demographic and clinical variables, three social contextual variables were significantly related to increased likelihood of receiving catheterization: knowing someone who had undergone the procedure (OR = 3.14; 95% CI, 1.70, 8.74), social support (OR = 2.05; 95% CI, 1.17, 2.78), and being encouraged by family to have procedure (OR = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.08, 1.90). After adding the social contextual variables, race was no longer significantly related to the likelihood of receiving catheterization, thus suggesting that social context plays an important role in the relationship between race and cardiac catheterization.
Our results suggest that social contextual factors are related to the likelihood of receiving recommended care. In addition, accounting for these relationships attenuated the observed race disparities between Whites and Blacks/African Americans who were recommended to undergo cardiac catheterization by their physicians.
侵入性心脏手术接受率的种族差异已有充分记录,但病因仍知之甚少。
我们研究了社会环境变量与被医生建议接受该手术的退伍军人样本中接受心脏导管插入术可能性的种族差异之间的关系。
前瞻性观察队列研究。
一项关于心脏导管插入术种族差异研究的子样本,包括48名黑人/非裔美国退伍军人和189名被医生建议接受心脏导管插入术的白人退伍军人。
我们评估了社会环境变量(例如,认识做过该手术的人、受到家人或朋友的鼓励)、临床变量(例如,高血压、最大药物治疗),以及参与者在研究期间是否在任何时间接受过心脏导管插入术。
即使在控制了年龄、教育程度和临床变量之后,黑人/非裔美国人接受心脏导管插入术的可能性仍低于白人(OR = 0.31;95%CI,0.13,0.75)。在控制了人口统计学和临床变量之后,三个社会环境变量与接受导管插入术可能性的增加显著相关:认识做过该手术的人(OR = 3.14;95%CI,1.70,8.74)、社会支持(OR = 2.05;95%CI,1.17,2.78),以及受到家人鼓励进行该手术(OR = 1.45;95%CI,1.08,1.90)。加入社会环境变量后,种族与接受导管插入术的可能性不再显著相关,因此表明社会环境在种族与心脏导管插入术之间的关系中起重要作用。
我们的结果表明,社会环境因素与接受推荐治疗的可能性相关。此外,考虑这些关系减弱了在被医生建议接受心脏导管插入术的白人和黑人/非裔美国人之间观察到的种族差异。