Department of Education, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-5500, USA.
Pediatrics. 2010 May;125(5):997-1002. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2728. Epub 2010 Apr 12.
To assess whether embedding pediatric anticipatory guidance into books read to infants is an effective way to educate low-income, first-time mothers about injury-prevention and health-promotion practices.
Primiparous women (N = 168) were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: an educational-book group; a noneducational-book group; or a no-book group. Knowledge of anticipatory-guidance topics regarding children from birth to 12 months of age (eg, injury prevention, parenting, nutrition) was assessed during the third trimester of pregnancy and again when infants were approximately 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months of age.
Women in the educational-book group scored consistently higher on knowledge than did those in the other 2 groups. Those in the educational-book group were found to have significantly higher knowledge scores than those in both the noneducational-book group (effect size [ES]: 0.3, P < .001) and the no-book group (ES: 0.3, P < .001) in the longitudinal model.
Books read by mothers to infants seem to be an effective way to provide anticipatory guidance to new mothers. However, future work is needed to determine if increased knowledge translates into safer and more developmentally appropriate parenting practices.
评估将儿科预期指导嵌入到为婴儿阅读的书籍中是否是向低收入、初次生育的母亲传授预防伤害和促进健康实践知识的有效方法。
将 168 名初产妇随机分配到以下 3 组之一:教育书籍组;非教育书籍组;或无书籍组。在妊娠晚期和婴儿大约 2、4、6、9、12 和 18 个月时,评估他们对从出生到 12 个月大的儿童(如预防伤害、育儿、营养)的预期指导主题知识。
教育书籍组的女性在知识方面的得分始终高于其他两组。在纵向模型中,教育书籍组的知识得分明显高于非教育书籍组(效应大小[ES]:0.3,P <.001)和无书籍组(ES:0.3,P <.001)。
母亲为婴儿阅读的书籍似乎是向新妈妈提供预期指导的有效方法。然而,需要进一步研究以确定知识的增加是否转化为更安全和更适合儿童发展的育儿实践。