Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Sep 1;35(19):E981-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c46fb4.
Observational cohort study. Retrospective review of prospectively collected outcomes data.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive (MIS) decompression for focal lumbar spinal stenosis (FLSS) in patients with and without deformity.
MIS, facet-preserving decompression has the potential of offering a significantly less morbid alternative to decompression and fusion in patients with leg dominant symptoms from degenerative spondylolisthesis and/or scoliosis.
Single surgeon, consecutive series (n=75), evaluated over 5 years. All patients had MIS lumbar laminoplasty (bilateral decompression from a unilateral approach) for FLSS (1-2 level). Patients had leg dominant, claudicant/radicular pain. Patients were divided into 4 groups: (A) stenosis with no deformity, n=22; (B) stenosis with spondylolisthesis only, n=25; (C) stenosis with scoliosis, n=16; and (D) stenosis combined with spondylolisthesis and scoliosis, n=12. The primary clinical outcome measures were the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and surgical revision rate. Preoperative and postoperative standing radiographs were assessed.
The average age was 68 years (40-89) with a mean time from surgery of 36.5 months (18-68). Average clinical improvement in ODI was 49.5% to 23.9% [mean postoperative follow-up of 31.8 months (24-72): group A=mean of 34.6; B=28.9; C=32.7; D=30 months]. Incidence of preoperative grade I spondylolisthesis was 46%. Spondylolisthesis progression (mean=8.4%) occurred in 9 patients and 2 patients developed spondylolisthesis. Overall revision rate was 10% [repeat decompression alone (n=2) and decompression and fusion (n=6)]. Subgroup analysis of preoperative and postoperative ODI and revision rate revealed (A) 48% to 18.7%, 0%; (B) 48% to 24.6%, 4%; (C) 50.7% to 31.5%; 25%; and (D) 53% to 22%, 25%, respectively. The revision rate for patient with scoliosis (C+D) was significant (P=0.0035) compared with those without. Six of the 8 revised patients had a preoperative lateral (rotatory) listhesis (3 in C and 3 in D).
MIS decompression alone for leg dominant symptoms is a clinically effective procedure in the majority of patients including those with degenerative spondylolisthesis or scoliosis. However, patients with scoliosis, particularly those with lateral listhesis, have a significantly higher revision rate that needs to be considered in operative decision-making.
观察性队列研究。回顾性分析前瞻性收集的结果数据。
本研究旨在评估微创(MIS)减压治疗局限性腰椎管狭窄症(FLSS)在伴或不伴畸形患者中的临床疗效。
MIS 保留关节突减压术有可能为退行性腰椎滑脱症和/或脊柱侧凸引起的下肢主导症状患者提供一种明显更微创的替代减压融合术的方法。
单外科医生连续系列(n=75),评估时间超过 5 年。所有患者均接受 MIS 腰椎板成形术(单侧入路双侧减压)治疗 FLSS(1-2 个节段)。患者有下肢主导的间歇性跛行/神经根痛。患者分为 4 组:(A)无畸形的狭窄,n=22;(B)仅有滑脱的狭窄,n=25;(C)有侧凸的狭窄,n=16;和(D)同时有滑脱和侧凸的狭窄,n=12。主要临床疗效评估指标为 Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)和手术翻修率。术前和术后站立位 X 线片进行评估。
平均年龄为 68 岁(40-89 岁),手术至随访的平均时间为 36.5 个月(18-68 个月)。ODI 的平均临床改善率为 49.5%至 23.9%[平均术后随访 31.8 个月(24-72 个月):A 组=平均 34.6;B 组=28.9;C 组=32.7;D 组=30 个月]。术前 I 度滑脱的发生率为 46%。9 例患者出现滑脱进展(平均=8.4%),2 例患者出现滑脱。总体翻修率为 10%[再次单纯减压(n=2)和减压融合(n=6)]。术前和术后 ODI 及翻修率的亚组分析显示:(A)48%至 18.7%,0%;(B)48%至 24.6%,4%;(C)50.7%至 31.5%,25%;和(D)53%至 22%,25%。伴或不伴脊柱侧凸(C+D)患者的翻修率有显著差异(P=0.0035)。8 例翻修患者中有 6 例术前存在侧方(旋转)滑脱(C 组 3 例,D 组 3 例)。
对于下肢主导症状的患者,单独进行 MIS 减压是一种临床有效的方法,包括退行性腰椎滑脱症或脊柱侧凸患者。然而,有脊柱侧凸的患者,特别是有侧方滑脱的患者,翻修率明显更高,这在手术决策时需要考虑。