Suppr超能文献

临床综述:危重症患者的评分系统。

Clinical review: scoring systems in the critically ill.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Route de Lennik 808, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2010;14(2):207. doi: 10.1186/cc8204. Epub 2010 Mar 26.

Abstract

General illness severity scores are widely used in the ICU to predict outcome, characterize disease severity and degree of organ dysfunction, and assess resource use. In this article we review the most commonly used scoring systems in each of these three groups. We examine the history of the development of the initial major systems in each group, discuss the construction of subsequent versions, and, when available, provide recent comparative data regarding their performance. Importantly, the different types of scores should be seen as complementary, rather than competitive and mutually exclusive. It is possible that their combined use could provide a more accurate indication of disease severity and prognosis. All these scoring systems will need to be updated with time as ICU populations change and new diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic techniques become available.

摘要

总体疾病严重程度评分被广泛用于 ICU 以预测预后、描述疾病严重程度和器官功能障碍程度,并评估资源利用情况。在本文中,我们将回顾这三组中最常用的评分系统。我们将考察每个主要系统最初开发的历史,讨论后续版本的构建情况,并且在可用的情况下,提供关于其性能的最新比较数据。重要的是,不同类型的评分系统应被视为互补,而不是竞争和互斥的。它们的联合使用可能提供对疾病严重程度和预后更准确的指示。随着 ICU 人群的变化和新的诊断、治疗和预后技术的出现,所有这些评分系统都需要随着时间的推移进行更新。

相似文献

1
Clinical review: scoring systems in the critically ill.
Crit Care. 2010;14(2):207. doi: 10.1186/cc8204. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
2
Intensive Care Unit Scoring Systems.
Crit Care Nurse. 2021 Aug 1;41(4):54-64. doi: 10.4037/ccn2021613.
3
Severity scoring in the ICU: a review.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008 Apr;52(4):467-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01586.x.
5
Utility of illness severity scoring for prediction of prolonged surgical critical care.
J Trauma. 1996 Apr;40(4):513-8; discussion 518-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199604000-00002.
6
Prognostication and intensive care unit outcome: the evolving role of scoring systems.
Clin Chest Med. 2003 Dec;24(4):751-62. doi: 10.1016/s0272-5231(03)00094-7.
7
Severity of illness.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;31(1):31-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1246287. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
9
Do we have reliable biochemical markers to predict the outcome of critical illness?
Int J Artif Organs. 2005 Dec;28(12):1197-210. doi: 10.1177/039139880502801202.
10
Risk scoring in perioperative and surgical intensive care patients: a review.
Curr Surg. 2006 May-Jun;63(3):226-36. doi: 10.1016/j.cursur.2006.02.005.

引用本文的文献

4
Development and validation of a multidimensional predictive model for 28-day mortality in ICU patients with bloodstream infections: a cohort study.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Jul 7;15:1569748. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1569748. eCollection 2025.
5
Assessing myocardial stunning during continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients.
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2025 Apr-Jun;15(2):57-65. doi: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_95_24. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
6
8
Beyond SOFA and APACHE II, Novel Risk Stratification Models Using Readily Available Biomarkers in Critical Care.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 28;15(9):1122. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15091122.

本文引用的文献

2
External validation of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) 3 in a cohort of 28,357 patients from 147 Italian intensive care units.
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Nov;35(11):1916-24. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1615-0. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
3
Austrian validation and customization of the SAPS 3 Admission Score.
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Apr;35(4):616-22. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1286-2. Epub 2008 Oct 10.
5
Outcome prediction in intensive care: why we need to reinvent the wheel.
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008 Oct;14(5):483-4. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328310dc7d.
7
Variation in ICU risk-adjusted mortality: impact of methods of assessment and potential confounders.
Chest. 2008 Jun;133(6):1319-1327. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-3061. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
8
Nursing Activities Score in the intensive care unit: analysis of the related factors.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2008 Jun;24(3):197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2007.09.004. Epub 2007 Oct 31.
9
Assessing the calibration of mortality benchmarks in critical care: The Hosmer-Lemeshow test revisited.
Crit Care Med. 2007 Sep;35(9):2052-6. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000275267.64078.B0.
10
A revised method to assess intensive care unit clinical performance and resource utilization.
Crit Care Med. 2007 Aug;35(8):1853-62. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000275272.57237.53.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验