Suppr超能文献

养老院质量指标的调整。

Adjustment of nursing home quality indicators.

机构信息

Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston MA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr 15;10:96. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-96.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This manuscript describes a method for adjustment of nursing home quality indicators (QIs) defined using the Center for Medicaid & Medicare Services (CMS) nursing home resident assessment system, the Minimum Data Set (MDS). QIs are intended to characterize quality of care delivered in a facility. Threats to the validity of the measurement of presumed quality of care include baseline resident health and functional status, pattern of comorbidities, and facility case mix. The goal of obtaining a valid facility-level estimate of true quality of care should include adjustment for resident- and facility-level sources of variability.

METHODS

We present a practical and efficient method to achieve risk adjustment using restriction and indirect and direct standardization. We present information on validity by comparing QIs estimated with the new algorithm to one currently used by CMS.

RESULTS

More than half of the new QIs achieved a "Moderate" validation level.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the comprehensive approach and the positive findings to date, research using the new quality indicators is warranted to provide further evidence of their validity and utility and to encourage their use in quality improvement activities.

摘要

背景

本文描述了一种使用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)疗养院居民评估系统(MDS)定义的疗养院质量指标(QIs)的调整方法。QIs 旨在描述在设施中提供的护理质量。假定护理质量测量的有效性受到威胁,包括居民的基线健康和功能状况、合并症模式以及设施的病例组合。获得真正护理质量的有效设施水平估计的目标应包括对居民和设施水平的变异性进行调整。

方法

我们提出了一种实用且高效的风险调整方法,使用限制和间接和直接标准化。我们通过将新算法估计的 QIs 与 CMS 当前使用的一种方法进行比较,提供了有关有效性的信息。

结果

超过一半的新 QIs 达到了“中等”验证水平。

结论

鉴于全面的方法和迄今为止的积极发现,使用新的质量指标进行研究是合理的,以进一步提供其有效性和实用性的证据,并鼓励在质量改进活动中使用它们。

相似文献

1
Adjustment of nursing home quality indicators.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr 15;10:96. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-96.
5
Inter-rater reliability of nursing home quality indicators in the U.S.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2003 Nov 4;3(1):20. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-3-20.
7
Improving quality assessment through multilevel modeling: the case of nursing home compare.
Health Serv Res. 2007 Jun;42(3 Pt 1):1177-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00647.x.
8
Does risk adjustment of the CMS quality measures for nursing homes matter?
Med Care. 2008 May;46(5):532-41. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31816099c5.
9
Achieving improvement through nursing home quality measurement.
Health Care Financ Rev. 2002 Summer;23(4):5-18.
10
The Quality Indicator Survey: background, implementation, and widespread change.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2013;25(1):10-29. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2012.705721.

引用本文的文献

3
Antipsychotic Medication Use Among Newly Admitted Long-term Care Residents During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Canada.
Health Serv Insights. 2024 Nov 29;17:11786329241300827. doi: 10.1177/11786329241300827. eCollection 2024.
4
The Integrated Care Team: A primary care based-approach to support older adults with complex health needs.
Healthc Manage Forum. 2025 May;38(3):192-199. doi: 10.1177/08404704241293051. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
6
The Community Rehabilitation Assessment: patient and clinician-reported outcomes in ambulatory rehabilitation.
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 May 22;4:1123334. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1123334. eCollection 2023.
7
9
Evidence for publicly reported quality indicators in residential long-term care: a systematic review.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 24;22(1):1408. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08804-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Sharing clinical information across care settings: the birth of an integrated assessment system.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Apr 29;9:71. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-71.
3
Invited commentary: variable selection versus shrinkage in the control of multiple confounders.
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Mar 1;167(5):523-9; discussion 530-1. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm355. Epub 2008 Jan 27.
5
Future development of nursing home quality indicators.
Gerontologist. 2005 Apr;45(2):147-56. doi: 10.1093/geront/45.2.147.
7
Inter-rater reliability of nursing home quality indicators in the U.S.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2003 Nov 4;3(1):20. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-3-20.
9
Evaluation of a risk-adjustment model for pressure ulcer development using the Minimum Data Set.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Jul;49(7):872-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49176.x.
10
Randomized clinical trial of a quality improvement intervention in nursing homes.
Gerontologist. 2001 Aug;41(4):525-38. doi: 10.1093/geront/41.4.525.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验