Centre of Excellence for Alzheimer's Disease Research & Care, School of Exercise Biomedical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20(4):1233-42. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-090249.
Amyloid-beta (Abeta) plays a central role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and has been postulated as a potential biomarker for AD. However, there is a lack of consensus as to its suitability as an AD biomarker. The objective of this study was to determine the significance of plasma Abeta as an AD biomarker and its relationship with Abeta load and to determine the effect of different assay methods on the interpretation of Abeta levels. Plasma Abeta1-40, Abeta1-42, and N-terminal cleaved fragments were measured using both a commercial multiplex assay and a well-documented ELISA in 1032 individuals drawn from the well-characterized Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging. Further, Abeta levels were compared to Abeta load derived from positron-emission tomography (PET) with the Pittsburgh compound B (PiB). Lower Abeta1-42 and Abeta1-42/1-40 ratio were observed in patients with AD and inversely correlated with PiB-PET derived Abeta load. However, assay methodology significantly impacted the interpretation of data. The cross-sectional analysis of plasma Abeta isoforms suggests that they may not be sufficient per se to diagnose AD. The value of their measurement in prognosis and monitoring of AD interventions needs further study, in addition to future longitudinal comparisons together with other predictors, which will determine whether plasma Abeta has diagnostic value in a panel of biomarkers.
淀粉样蛋白-β(Abeta)在阿尔茨海默病(AD)的发病机制中起核心作用,并被推测为 AD 的潜在生物标志物。然而,其作为 AD 生物标志物的适宜性尚未达成共识。本研究旨在确定血浆 Abeta 作为 AD 生物标志物的意义及其与 Abeta 负荷的关系,并确定不同检测方法对 Abeta 水平解读的影响。从澳大利亚成像、生物标志物和生活方式(AIBL)老化研究中抽取的 1032 名个体中,使用商业多指标测定法和经过充分记录的 ELISA,分别测定了血浆 Abeta1-40、Abeta1-42 和 N 末端片段。此外,还将 Abeta 水平与正电子发射断层扫描(PET)与匹兹堡化合物 B(PiB)得出的 Abeta 负荷进行了比较。AD 患者的 Abeta1-42 和 Abeta1-42/1-40 比值较低,与 PiB-PET 得出的 Abeta 负荷呈负相关。然而,检测方法极大地影响了数据的解读。血浆 Abeta 异构体的横断面分析表明,它们本身可能不足以诊断 AD。还需要进一步研究其在 AD 预后和干预监测中的测量价值,除了与其他预测因子进行未来的纵向比较外,这将决定血浆 Abeta 在生物标志物组中是否具有诊断价值。