Parnes Nata, Jupiter Jesse B
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Instr Course Lect. 2010;59:539-52.
Proximal humerus fractures are common, especially among patients older than 60 years who have osteoporosis. Several techniques have been used within the past several decades to treat displaced proximal humerus fractures. Many different implants have been investigated and tested, all with inadequate results; debate continues as to the best method of fixation. Fixed-angle locking plates offer a relatively new treatment option for these complicated fractures, especially in patients with osteoporosis. The use of locking plates for treating comminuted proximal humerus fractures has biologic and biomechanical advantages over conventional fixation techniques. Complications including varus fracture collapse and screw penetration of the articular surface nonetheless remain problematic. Although the locking plate technique provides exceptional fixation stability, its use must be tailored to the individual patient, taking into account the extent of trauma, the fracture characteristics, and the patient's age and expectations; therefore, it must be carefully weighed against other forms of treatment. Prospective clinical trials and further study are necessary to generate data comparing locking plate fixation and alternative surgical treatments.
肱骨近端骨折很常见,尤其是在60岁以上患有骨质疏松症的患者中。在过去几十年里,已经使用了多种技术来治疗移位的肱骨近端骨折。人们研究和测试了许多不同的植入物,但结果都不尽人意;关于最佳固定方法的争论仍在继续。角稳定锁定钢板为这些复杂骨折提供了一种相对较新的治疗选择,尤其是在骨质疏松症患者中。与传统固定技术相比,使用锁定钢板治疗粉碎性肱骨近端骨折具有生物学和生物力学优势。然而,包括内翻骨折塌陷和螺钉穿入关节面在内的并发症仍然是个问题。尽管锁定钢板技术提供了出色的固定稳定性,但必须根据个体患者的情况进行调整,要考虑到创伤程度、骨折特征以及患者的年龄和期望;因此,必须仔细权衡其与其他治疗方式的利弊。有必要进行前瞻性临床试验和进一步研究,以生成比较锁定钢板固定和其他手术治疗的数据。