Department of Physics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada.
Biointerphases. 2007 Dec;2(4):MR17-71. doi: 10.1116/1.2815690.
This review is presented as a common foundation for scientists interested in nanoparticles, their origin,activity, and biological toxicity. It is written with the goal of rationalizing and informing public health concerns related to this sometimes-strange new science of "nano," while raising awareness of nanomaterials' toxicity among scientists and manufacturers handling them.We show that humans have always been exposed to tiny particles via dust storms, volcanic ash, and other natural processes, and that our bodily systems are well adapted to protect us from these potentially harmful intruders. There ticuloendothelial system, in particular, actively neutralizes and eliminates foreign matter in the body,including viruses and nonbiological particles. Particles originating from human activities have existed for millennia, e.g., smoke from combustion and lint from garments, but the recent development of industry and combustion-based engine transportation has profoundly increased an thropogenic particulate pollution. Significantly, technological advancement has also changed the character of particulate pollution, increasing the proportion of nanometer-sized particles--"nanoparticles"--and expanding the variety of chemical compositions. Recent epidemiological studies have shown a strong correlation between particulate air pollution levels, respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, various cancers, and mortality. Adverse effects of nanoparticles on human health depend on individual factors such as genetics and existing disease, as well as exposure, and nanoparticle chemistry, size, shape,agglomeration state, and electromagnetic properties. Animal and human studies show that inhaled nanoparticles are less efficiently removed than larger particles by the macrophage clearance mechanisms in the lungs, causing lung damage, and that nanoparticles can translocate through the circulatory, lymphatic, and nervous systems to many tissues and organs, including the brain. The key to understanding the toxicity of nanoparticles is that their minute size, smaller than cells and cellular organelles, allows them to penetrate these basic biological structures, disrupting their normal function.Examples of toxic effects include tissue inflammation, and altered cellular redox balance toward oxidation, causing abnormal function or cell death. The manipulation of matter at the scale of atoms,"nanotechnology," is creating many new materials with characteristics not always easily predicted from current knowledge. Within the nearly limitless diversity of these materials, some happen to be toxic to biological systems, others are relatively benign, while others confer health benefits. Some of these materials have desirable characteristics for industrial applications, as nanostructured materials often exhibit beneficial properties, from UV absorbance in sunscreen to oil-less lubrication of motors.A rational science-based approach is needed to minimize harm caused by these materials, while supporting continued study and appropriate industrial development. As current knowledge of the toxicology of "bulk" materials may not suffice in reliably predicting toxic forms of nanoparticles,ongoing and expanded study of "nanotoxicity" will be necessary. For nanotechnologies with clearly associated health risks, intelligent design of materials and devices is needed to derive the benefits of these new technologies while limiting adverse health impacts. Human exposure to toxic nanoparticles can be reduced through identifying creation-exposure pathways of toxins, a study that may someday soon unravel the mysteries of diseases such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's. Reduction in fossil fuel combustion would have a large impact on global human exposure to nanoparticles, as would limiting deforestation and desertification.While nanotoxicity is a relatively new concept to science, this review reveals the result of life's long history of evolution in the presence of nanoparticles, and how the human body, in particular, has adapted to defend itself against nanoparticulate intruders.
这篇综述旨在为对纳米粒子及其起源、活性和生物毒性感兴趣的科学家提供一个共同的基础。它的撰写目的是使与“纳米”这门有时显得陌生的新兴科学有关的公众健康问题合理化和知情化,同时提高科学家和处理纳米材料的制造商对纳米材料毒性的认识。我们表明,人类一直通过沙尘暴、火山灰和其他自然过程暴露于微小颗粒中,而我们的身体系统很好地适应了保护我们免受这些潜在有害入侵者的侵害。特别是,网状内皮系统积极中和和消除体内的异物,包括病毒和非生物颗粒。源自人类活动的颗粒已经存在了数千年,例如燃烧产生的烟雾和衣物上的绒毛,但最近工业和基于燃烧的发动机运输的发展极大地增加了人为颗粒污染。值得注意的是,技术进步也改变了颗粒污染的性质,增加了纳米尺寸颗粒(“纳米颗粒”)的比例,并扩大了化学成分的种类。最近的流行病学研究表明,颗粒物空气污染水平与呼吸道和心血管疾病、各种癌症和死亡率之间存在很强的相关性。纳米颗粒对人类健康的不良影响取决于个体因素,如遗传和现有疾病、暴露以及纳米颗粒化学、大小、形状、团聚状态和电磁特性。动物和人体研究表明,吸入的纳米颗粒被肺部的巨噬细胞清除机制去除的效率低于较大颗粒,导致肺部损伤,并且纳米颗粒可以通过循环、淋巴和神经系统转移到许多组织和器官,包括大脑。理解纳米颗粒毒性的关键是,它们的微小尺寸小于细胞和细胞细胞器,使它们能够穿透这些基本的生物结构,扰乱其正常功能。毒性作用的例子包括组织炎症和细胞氧化还原平衡向氧化方向的改变,导致功能异常或细胞死亡。在原子尺度上对物质的操纵,即“纳米技术”,正在创造许多具有不一定容易从现有知识预测的特性的新材料。在这些材料几乎无限的多样性中,有些碰巧对生物系统有毒,有些相对良性,而有些则对健康有益。这些材料中的一些具有工业应用的理想特性,因为纳米结构材料通常表现出有益的特性,从防晒霜中的紫外线吸收到电机的无油润滑。需要采取基于科学的合理方法来最小化这些材料造成的危害,同时支持持续的研究和适当的工业发展。由于目前对“块状”材料毒理学的了解可能不足以可靠地预测纳米颗粒的有毒形式,因此需要对“纳米毒性”进行持续和扩展的研究。对于具有明显相关健康风险的纳米技术,需要设计具有智能材料和设备,以从这些新技术中获得益处,同时限制对健康的不利影响。通过确定毒素的产生-暴露途径,可以减少人类对有毒纳米颗粒的暴露,这项研究有朝一日可能会揭开帕金森氏症和阿尔茨海默氏症等疾病的奥秘。减少化石燃料的燃烧将对全球人类暴露于纳米颗粒产生重大影响,限制森林砍伐和荒漠化也是如此。尽管纳米毒性对科学来说是一个相对较新的概念,但这篇综述揭示了生命在存在纳米颗粒的情况下长期进化的结果,以及特别是人体如何适应防御纳米颗粒入侵者。