Hemsley Gayle, Holm Alison, Dodd Barbara
University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Australia.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010 Aug;12(4):362-74. doi: 10.3109/17549501003721064.
This study examined the lexical development of nine Samoan-English bilingual children during their first year in English speaking preschools in Australia. Receptive and expressive lexicon in Samoan and English was assessed when the children had completed their first term of school (approximately 10 weeks) and then 6 months later. The bilingual children's scores in each language and composite scores were examined over time. Performance was also compared with typically developing, age-matched (4-5-year-old) monolingual English-speaking peers. Results indicated that the group made significant gains in both languages over time. The bilingual children's receptive composite scores were comparable to monolingual English scores, with clear changes in lexical composition (singlets and translation equivalents) over time. Expressive composite scores of bilingual children were lower than scores of monolingual peers. Results appeared to be highly influenced by the language environment and patterns of language use in this group. The potential use of composite score methodology as a clinical assessment tool in bilingual children is discussed.
本研究考察了九名萨摩亚 - 英语双语儿童在澳大利亚英语幼儿园就读的第一年中的词汇发展情况。当孩子们完成第一学期学业(约10周)时以及6个月后,对他们在萨摩亚语和英语方面的接受性词汇和表达性词汇进行了评估。随着时间的推移,对双语儿童在每种语言上的得分以及综合得分进行了考察。还将他们的表现与发育正常、年龄匹配(4 - 5岁)的单语英语同龄人进行了比较。结果表明,随着时间的推移,该群体在两种语言上都取得了显著进步。双语儿童的接受性综合得分与单语英语得分相当,词汇构成(单个词汇和翻译对等词)随时间有明显变化。双语儿童的表达性综合得分低于单语同龄人的得分。结果似乎受到该群体语言环境和语言使用模式的高度影响。讨论了综合得分方法作为双语儿童临床评估工具的潜在用途。