Oral Imaging Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Aug;15(4):537-49. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0416-8. Epub 2010 May 5.
The aim of this study was the determination of image accuracy and quality for periodontal diagnosis using various X-ray generators with conventional and digital radiographs. Thirty-one in vitro periodontal defects were evaluated on intraoral conventional (E-, F/E-speed) and digital images (three indirect, two direct sensors). Standardised radiographs were made with an alternating current (AC), a high-frequency (HF) and a direct current (DC) X-ray unit at rising exposure times (20-160 ms with 20-ms interval) with a constant kV of 70. Three observers assessed bone levels for comparison to the gold standard. Lamina dura, contrast, trabecularisation, crater and furcation involvements were evaluated. Irrespective X-ray generator-type, measurement deviations increased at higher exposure times for solid-state, but decreased for photostimulable storage phosphor (PSP) systems. Accuracy for HF or DC was significantly higher than AC (p < 0.0001), especially at low exposure times. At 0.5- to 1-mm clinical deviation, 27-53% and 32-55% dose savings were demonstrated when using HF or DC generators compared to AC, but only for PSP. No savings were found for solid-state sensors, indicating their higher sensitivity. The use of digital sensors compared to film allowed 15-90% dose savings using the AC tube, whilst solid-state sensors allowed approximately 50% savings compared to PSP, depending on tube type and threshold level.. Accuracy of periodontal diagnosis increases when using HF or DC generators and/or digital receptors with adequate diagnostic information at lower exposure times.
本研究旨在确定使用不同的 X 射线发生器以及传统和数字射线照相术进行牙周病诊断的图像准确性和质量。在口腔内的传统(E-,F/E-速度)和数字图像(三个间接,两个直接传感器)上评估了 31 个体外牙周缺损。使用交流(AC),高频(HF)和直流(DC)X 射线机以递增的曝光时间(20-160 ms,间隔 20 ms)以恒定的 70 kV 制作标准射线照片。三位观察者评估了骨水平以与金标准进行比较。评估了硬骨膜,对比度,小梁化,坑和分叉参与情况。无论 X 射线发生器类型如何,对于固态,随着曝光时间的增加,测量偏差增加,但对于光激励存储磷光体(PSP)系统则减少。与 AC 相比,HF 或 DC 的准确性明显更高(p <0.0001),尤其是在低曝光时间。在 0.5 至 1mm 的临床偏差下,与 AC 相比,使用 HF 或 DC 发生器时,27-53%和 32-55%的剂量可节省,但是仅对于 PSP。未发现固态传感器有节省,表明其灵敏度更高。与胶片相比,使用数字传感器可节省 15-90%的剂量使用 AC 管,而固态传感器与 PSP 相比,节省了大约 50%的剂量,具体取决于管类型和阈值水平。使用 HF 或 DC 发生器以及/或数字接收器在较低的曝光时间内可以获得足够的诊断信息,从而提高了牙周病诊断的准确性。