Suppr超能文献

在急症护理环境中研究医患沟通:住院医师关系研究。

Studying physician-patient communication in the acute care setting: the hospitalist rapport study.

机构信息

Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0903, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Feb;82(2):275-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.015. Epub 2010 May 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of studying physician-patient communication in the acute care setting.

METHODS

We recruited hospitalist physicians and patients from two hospitals within a university system and audio-recorded their first encounter. Recruitment, data collection, and challenges encountered were tracked.

RESULTS

Thirty-two physicians consented (rate 91%). Between August 2008 and March 2009, 441 patients were referred, 210 (48%) were screened, and 119 (66% of 179 eligible) consented. We audio-recorded encounters of 80 patients with 27 physicians. Physicians' primary concern about participation was interference with their workflow. Addressing their concerns and building the protocol around their schedules facilitated participation. Challenges unique to the acute care setting were: (1) extremely limited time for patient identification, screening, and enrollment during which patients were ill and busy with clinical care activities and (2) little advance knowledge of when physician-patient encounters would occur. Employing a full-time study coordinator mitigated these challenges.

CONCLUSION

Physician concerns for participating in communication studies are similar in ambulatory and acute care settings. The acute care setting presents novel challenges for patient recruitment and data collection.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

These methods should be used to study provider-patient communication in acute care settings. Future work should test strategies to increase patient enrollment.

摘要

目的

评估在急症护理环境中研究医患沟通的可行性。

方法

我们招募了一所大学系统内的医院内科医生和患者,并对他们的首次就诊进行了录音。记录了招募、数据收集和遇到的挑战。

结果

32 名医生同意参与(参与率为 91%)。2008 年 8 月至 2009 年 3 月,共有 441 名患者被转介,210 名(48%)接受了筛选,119 名(符合条件的 179 名患者中的 66%)同意参与。我们对 80 名患者和 27 名医生的就诊情况进行了录音。医生参与的主要顾虑是干扰他们的工作流程。解决这些顾虑并根据他们的日程安排制定方案,有助于参与。急症护理环境特有的挑战包括:(1)在患者识别、筛选和入组期间,患者病情严重且忙于临床护理活动,因此可用于患者识别、筛选和入组的时间极其有限;(2)几乎无法提前了解医患就诊的时间。聘请全职研究协调员有助于解决这些挑战。

结论

在门诊和急症护理环境中,医生参与沟通研究的担忧是相似的。急症护理环境给患者招募和数据收集带来了新的挑战。

实践意义

这些方法可用于急症护理环境中研究医患沟通。未来的工作应测试增加患者入组的策略。

相似文献

5
Ethical and policy implications of hospitalist systems.住院医师制度的伦理与政策影响。
Am J Med. 2001 Dec 21;111(9B):48-52. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(01)00972-x.
6
Rapport and the hospitalist.医患关系与住院医师
Dis Mon. 2002 Apr;48(4):250-9. doi: 10.1016/s0011-5029(02)90032-5.
9
Rapport and the hospitalist.融洽关系与住院医师
Am J Med. 2001 Dec 21;111(9B):31S-35S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(01)00967-6.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验