Wayne State University School of Medicine, Department of Dermatology, 18100 Oakwood Boulevard, Suite 300, Dearborn, Michigan 48124, USA.
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010 Jul;10(7):1105-12. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2010.487061.
TNF-alpha inhibitors such as etanercept have been used for psoriasis for years. A fairly well defined efficacy and safety profile has developed. A new biologic agent, ustekinumab, an IL-12 and IL-23 inhibitor, has recently been released in the US for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. The purpose of this article is to compare the efficacy and safety profiles of ustekinumab and etanercept.
We examined safety and efficacy data regarding ustekinumab and etanercept from clinical reports, a head-to-head trial, review articles, and databases and registries from the last 20 years.
Evidence is reviewed about the efficacy for the treatment of psoriasis as well as the safety profiles for both agents, ustekinumab and etanercept.
Both drugs have data to confirm efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the short-term. The limited long-term data on the safety profile of ustekinumab requires careful judgment on the clinician's part, weighing well-defined benefits and potential unknown risks.
TNF-α 抑制剂如依那西普已用于银屑病多年。已制定出相当明确的疗效和安全性概况。最近,一种新的生物制剂乌司奴单抗(一种 IL-12 和 IL-23 抑制剂)在美国获准用于治疗中重度银屑病。本文旨在比较乌司奴单抗和依那西普的疗效和安全性。
我们从临床报告、头对头试验、综述文章以及过去 20 年的数据库和登记处中,查阅了关于乌司奴单抗和依那西普的安全性和疗效数据。
对这两种药物治疗银屑病的疗效以及这两种药物(乌司奴单抗和依那西普)的安全性概况都有证据。
这两种药物都有数据证实它们在中重度银屑病患者中的短期疗效和安全性。乌司奴单抗的有限的长期安全性数据需要临床医生仔细判断,权衡明确的益处和潜在的未知风险。