Suppr超能文献

基台螺钉涂层对种植体初始稳定性的影响。

Effects of abutment screw coating on implant preload.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2010 Aug;19(6):458-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00595.x. Epub 2010 Apr 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of tungsten carbide carbon (WC/CTa) screw surface coating on abutment screw preload in three implant connection systems in comparison to noncoated titanium alloy (Ta) screws.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preload of WC/CTa abutment screws was compared to noncoated Ta screws in three implant connection systems. The differences in preloads were measured in tightening rotational angle, compression force, initial screw removal torque, and postload screw removal torque after 1 million cyclic loads. Preload loss percent was calculated to determine the efficacy of maintaining the preload of two abutment screw types in relation to implant connection systems.

RESULTS

WC/CTa screws provided 10 degrees higher tightening rotational angle than Ta screws in all three connection systems. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). External-hex butt joint implant connections had a higher compression force than the two internal conical implant connections. WC/CTa screws provided a statistically significantly higher compression force than Ta screws in all three implant connections (p < 0.05). Ta screws required statistically higher removal torque than WC/CTa screws in all three implant connections (p < 0.05); however, Ta screws needed statistically lower postload removal torque than WC/CTa screws in all three implant connections (p < 0.05). Ta screws had a statistically higher preload loss percent than WC/CTa screws in all three implant connections (p < 0.05), indicating that WC/CTa screws were superior in maintaining the preload than Ta screws.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limits of present study, the following conclusions were made: (1) WC/CTa screws provided higher preload than noncoated Ta screws in all three implant connection systems. (2) The initial removal torque for Ta screws required higher force than WC/CTa screws, whereas postload removal torque for Ta screws was lower than WC/CTa screws. Calculated Ta screw preload loss percent was higher than for WC/CTa screws, suggesting that WC/CTa screws were more effective in maintaining the preload than Ta screws. (3) Internal conical connections were more effective in maintaining the screw preload in cyclic loads than external-hex butt joint connections.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较碳化钨碳(WC/CTa)螺钉表面涂层与非涂层钛合金(Ta)螺钉对三种种植体连接系统中基台螺钉预紧力的影响。

材料与方法

比较三种种植体连接系统中 WC/CTa 基台螺钉与非涂层 Ta 螺钉的预紧力。通过拧紧旋转角度、压缩力、初始螺钉拆卸扭矩和 100 万次循环负载后的后载螺钉拆卸扭矩来测量预紧力的差异。计算预紧力损失百分比,以确定两种基台螺钉类型在与种植体连接系统相关的情况下维持预紧力的效果。

结果

在所有三种连接系统中,WC/CTa 螺钉的拧紧旋转角度比 Ta 螺钉高 10 度。这一差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。外六角对接连接的种植体具有比两种内锥形种植体更高的压缩力。在所有三种种植体连接中,WC/CTa 螺钉提供的压缩力均明显高于 Ta 螺钉(p<0.05)。在所有三种种植体连接中,Ta 螺钉所需的拆卸扭矩均明显高于 WC/CTa 螺钉(p<0.05);然而,在所有三种种植体连接中,Ta 螺钉的后载拆卸扭矩均明显低于 WC/CTa 螺钉(p<0.05)。在所有三种种植体连接中,Ta 螺钉的预紧力损失百分比均明显高于 WC/CTa 螺钉(p<0.05),表明 WC/CTa 螺钉在维持预紧力方面优于 Ta 螺钉。

结论

在本研究范围内得出以下结论:(1)在所有三种种植体连接系统中,WC/CTa 螺钉提供的预紧力均高于非涂层 Ta 螺钉。(2)Ta 螺钉的初始拆卸扭矩需要更高的力,而 Ta 螺钉的后载拆卸扭矩则低于 WC/CTa 螺钉。计算得出的 Ta 螺钉预紧力损失百分比高于 WC/CTa 螺钉,表明 WC/CTa 螺钉在维持预紧力方面比 Ta 螺钉更有效。(3)与外六角对接连接相比,内锥形连接在循环负载中更有效地维持螺钉预紧力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验