School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Schizophr Bull. 2010 Sep;36(5):935-48. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbq043. Epub 2010 May 12.
To address significant gaps in our understanding about how neurocognition, intrinsic motivation (IM), and psychosocial functioning are interrelated in schizophrenia, this study investigated the following questions: Is IM stable or dynamic over time? Does neurocognition predict change in IM over time? What is the association between change in neurocognition, change in IM, and change in psychosocial functioning? Finally, what is the causal structure of the relationships among neurocognition, IM, and psychosocial functioning over time? One hundred and thirty individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were recruited from 4 community-based psychosocial rehabilitation programs in urban Los Angeles. Measures of neurocognition were taken at baseline and 12 months. Measures of IM, psychosocial functioning, and symptoms were taken at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Results of latent growth curve modeling analyses demonstrated that IM is dynamic over time. Baseline neurocognition was associated with the initial level of IM but did not predict the rate of change in motivation. However, baseline levels of IM predicted rates of subsequent improvement in neurocognition. Change in IM was strongly associated with change in psychosocial functioning, and change in neurocognition was associated with change in psychosocial functioning, but change in IM was not associated with change in neurocognition. Latent difference score analyses revealed that neurocognition caused changes in psychosocial functioning, and psychosocial functioning caused changes in IM. These findings improve our fundamental understanding of the relationships among these variables and contribute to intervention development for improving outcomes in schizophrenia.
为了解决我们在精神分裂症中神经认知、内在动机(IM)和心理社会功能相互关系方面理解上的重大差距,本研究调查了以下问题:IM 是否随时间稳定或动态变化?神经认知是否预测 IM 随时间的变化?神经认知的变化、IM 的变化和心理社会功能的变化之间有什么关系?最后,神经认知、IM 和心理社会功能随时间的关系的因果结构是什么?从洛杉矶的 4 个社区心理康复计划中招募了 130 名被诊断为精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍的个体。在基线和 12 个月时进行神经认知测量。在基线、6 个月和 12 个月时进行 IM、心理社会功能和症状的测量。潜在增长曲线建模分析的结果表明,IM 随时间动态变化。基线神经认知与初始 IM 水平相关,但不能预测动机的变化率。然而,基线 IM 水平预测了随后神经认知的改善率。IM 的变化与心理社会功能的变化密切相关,神经认知的变化与心理社会功能的变化相关,但 IM 的变化与神经认知的变化无关。潜在差异分数分析显示,神经认知导致心理社会功能的变化,而心理社会功能导致 IM 的变化。这些发现提高了我们对这些变量之间关系的基本理解,并为改善精神分裂症的结果的干预措施的发展做出了贡献。