Suppr超能文献

他克莫司治疗活动期类风湿关节炎的系统评价和荟萃分析:随机对照试验。

Tacrolimus for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Korea University Medical Centre, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Scand J Rheumatol. 2010 Aug;39(4):271-8. doi: 10.3109/03009740903501642.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We surveyed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and open-label studies that examined the efficacy and toxicity of tacrolimus in disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD)--and methotrexate (MTX)-resistant or -intolerant patients with active RA patients using Medline, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and by performing manual searches. Meta-analysis of RCTs was performed to determine treatment efficacy and safety outcomes. The results are presented as risk ratios (RRs), weighted mean differences (WMDs), or standardized mean differences (SMDs). Open-label studies were included in the systematic review.

RESULTS

The four RCTs included 1014 DMARD-resistant or -intolerant patients with DMARD-resistant or -intolerant RA. Median follow-up duration was 6 (range 4-6) months. American College of Rheumatology 20, 50, and 70% (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70) response rates were significantly higher in the tacrolimus 3 mg/day group (n = 390) than in the controls (n = 402) [primary efficacy outcome, ACR50; risk ratio (RR) 2.583, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.095-6.092, p = 0.030], and efficacies in the tacrolimus 1.5-2 mg/day group showed a similar pattern. Patients treated with tacrolimus withdrew from treatment because of adverse events (n = 222) (primary safety outcome, withdrawals due to adverse events; RR 1.475, 95% CI 0.895-2.187, p = 0.053) more frequently than controls (n = 231), although this was not significant. All four open-label studies found that tacrolimus was safe, well-tolerated, and provided clinical benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus, at dosages of 1.5-3 mg/day, was found to be effective in DMARD-resistant or -intolerant patients with active RA.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估他克莫司在活动期类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们检索了 Medline、Cochrane 对照试验注册库以及手动检索,以评估他克莫司在疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARD)-和甲氨蝶呤(MTX)耐药或不耐受的活动期 RA 患者中的疗效和毒性的随机对照试验(RCT)和开放标签研究。对 RCT 进行荟萃分析以确定治疗效果和安全性结局。结果以风险比(RR)、加权均数差(WMD)或标准化均数差(SMD)表示。开放标签研究纳入系统评价。

结果

四项 RCT 纳入了 1014 例 DMARD 耐药或不耐受的 DMARD 耐药或不耐受的 RA 患者。中位随访时间为 6(范围 4-6)个月。他克莫司 3mg/天组(n=390)的美国风湿病学会 20%、50%和 70%(ACR20、ACR50 和 ACR70)缓解率显著高于对照组(n=402)[主要疗效结局,ACR50;RR 2.583,95%置信区间(CI)1.095-6.092,p=0.030],他克莫司 1.5-2mg/天组的疗效也呈现类似模式。由于不良反应(n=222)(主要安全性结局,因不良反应而停药;RR 1.475,95%CI 0.895-2.187,p=0.053),接受他克莫司治疗的患者比对照组(n=231)更频繁地停药,但差异无统计学意义。四项开放标签研究均发现他克莫司安全、耐受良好,并提供了临床获益。

结论

他克莫司的剂量为 1.5-3mg/天,在 DMARD 耐药或不耐受的活动期 RA 患者中有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验