Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Drugs. 2010 May 28;70(8):965-81. doi: 10.2165/10898540-000000000-00000.
Despite remarkable advances in the diagnostic and therapeutic modalities for its management, cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains one of the most important pathogens impacting on the outcome of transplantation. Not only does CMV directly cause morbidity and occasional mortality, it also influences many short-term and long-term indirect effects that collectively contribute to reduced allograft and patient survival. Prevention of CMV infection and disease is therefore key in ensuring the successful outcome of solid organ transplantation (SOT). In this regard, antiviral prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy are similarly effective in preventing CMV disease after transplantation. However, current guidelines prefer antiviral prophylaxis over pre-emptive therapy in preventing CMV disease in high-risk SOT recipients, such as CMV-seronegative recipients of organs from CMV-seropositive donors (CMV D+/R-), and lung, intestinal and pancreas transplant recipients. Antiviral prophylaxis has the benefits of reducing not only the incidence of CMV disease, but also the indirect effects of CMV on allograft and patient survival. The major drawback of antiviral prophylaxis is delayed-onset CMV disease, which occurs in 15-38% of CMV D+/R- SOT recipients who received 3 months of prophylaxis. Allograft rejection, over-immunosuppression and lack of CMV-specific immunity are factors that predispose patients to delayed-onset CMV disease. A recent randomized trial in CMV D+/R- kidney recipients demonstrates a significant reduction in the incidence of CMV disease when valganciclovir prophylaxis is extended to 200 days (compared with the standard 100 days) after transplantation; however, the safety and cost of this prolonged approach has yet to be assessed. In some studies, delayed-onset CMV disease has been significantly associated with allograft loss and mortality. In the vast majority of patients, CMV disease responds to treatment with intravenous ganciclovir. Recently, oral valganciclovir was demonstrated to have an efficacy that is comparable to intravenous ganciclovir in treating mild to moderate cases of CMV disease in SOT recipients. Reduction in the degree of immunosuppression should complement antiviral treatment of CMV disease. Although it remains rare, ganciclovir-resistant CMV disease is increasingly seen in clinical practice, potentially fostered by the prolonged use of antivirals in high-risk over-immunosuppressed transplant recipients. Treatment of drug-resistant CMV is currently non-standardized and may include foscarnet, cidofovir, CMV hyperimmune globulins or leflunomide. The investigational drug marivabir had the potential to treat ganciclovir-resistant CMV disease as it acts through a different mechanism. However, the recent phase III clinical trial in allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients showed that maribavir was not significantly better than placebo for the prevention of CMV disease. Similarly, the preliminary data in a liver transplant population suggests that maribavir was inferior to oral ganciclovir for the prevention of CMV disease. This article reviews the recent data and other developments in the management of CMV infection after SOT.
尽管在其管理的诊断和治疗方式方面取得了显著进展,但巨细胞病毒(CMV)仍然是影响移植结果的最重要病原体之一。CMV 不仅直接导致发病率和偶尔的死亡率,还会影响许多短期和长期的间接影响,这些影响共同导致移植物和患者存活率降低。因此,预防 CMV 感染和疾病是确保实体器官移植(SOT)成功的关键。在这方面,抗病毒预防和抢先治疗在移植后预防 CMV 疾病方面同样有效。然而,目前的指南更倾向于在预防高风险 SOT 受者(如 CMV 阴性受者从 CMV 阳性供者(CMV D+/R-)接受器官,以及肺、肠和胰腺移植受者)的 CMV 疾病中使用抗病毒预防而不是抢先治疗。抗病毒预防不仅可以降低 CMV 疾病的发生率,还可以降低 CMV 对移植物和患者存活率的间接影响。抗病毒预防的主要缺点是迟发性 CMV 疾病,在接受 3 个月预防治疗的 CMV D+/R- SOT 受者中,15-38%发生迟发性 CMV 疾病。移植物排斥、过度免疫抑制和缺乏 CMV 特异性免疫是使患者易发生迟发性 CMV 疾病的因素。一项最近针对 CMV D+/R-肾移植受者的随机试验表明,延长缬更昔洛韦预防治疗(与标准的 100 天相比)至移植后 200 天可显著降低 CMV 疾病的发生率;然而,这种延长方法的安全性和成本尚未得到评估。在一些研究中,迟发性 CMV 疾病与移植物丢失和死亡率显著相关。在绝大多数患者中,CMV 疾病对更昔洛韦静脉治疗有反应。最近,口服缬更昔洛韦已被证明在治疗 SOT 受者的轻度至中度 CMV 疾病方面与更昔洛韦静脉治疗具有等效的疗效。减少免疫抑制程度应补充 CMV 疾病的抗病毒治疗。尽管它仍然很少见,但更昔洛韦耐药 CMV 疾病在临床实践中越来越常见,这可能是由于高危过度免疫抑制移植受者长期使用抗病毒药物所致。目前,耐药 CMV 疾病的治疗是非标准化的,可能包括膦甲酸、西多福韦、CMV 免疫球蛋白或来氟米特。研究药物 maribavir 具有治疗更昔洛韦耐药 CMV 疾病的潜力,因为它通过不同的机制发挥作用。然而,最近在异基因骨髓移植受者中的 III 期临床试验表明,maribavir 在预防 CMV 疾病方面并不明显优于安慰剂。同样,在肝移植人群中的初步数据表明,maribavir 在预防 CMV 疾病方面不如口服更昔洛韦。本文综述了 SOT 后 CMV 感染管理的最新数据和其他进展。