Suppr超能文献

前扣带回肿瘤的手术入路。

Surgical approaches to tumors of the anterior gyrus cinguli.

机构信息

Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Sciences and Vision, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2010 Jun;66(6 Suppl Operative):245-51. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000369652.59204.99.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tumors of the gyrus cinguli are deep-seated, and may require a variety of surgical options. We focused on anterior tumors, which have specific anatomic and surgical features.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate different approaches and indications through detailed description and a review of our experience.

METHODS

These approaches include unilateral interhemispheric or combined: bilateral interhemispheric, unilateral plus superior frontal gyrectomy, or unilateral plus frontal polectomy. The relevance of this retrospective analysis is stressed by the extremely limited literature in this regard.

RESULTS

In the past 5 years we operated on 38 patients with gliomas. We compared the following variables: location (perigenual, prerolandic), pathology (glioblastoma, other gliomas), size (<4 cm, > or =4 cm), extension (unilateral, bilateral), and approach (unilateral interhemispheric, combined). The only significant association we found was between tumor location (perigenual) and bilateral extension (P < .01). However, combined approaches were adopted only slightly more frequently in this region than in the prerolandic area, and this resulted in a lower rate of total removal (33% vs 76%, P < .01). Gross total removal was achieved in 28 cases (66%) and was significantly associated with combined approaches (77% vs 50%, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of a combined approach to anterior gyrus cinguli tumors is critical to improving the quality of resection in selected cases. We recommend a combined approach in the surgical treatment of large tumors of the perigenual area.

摘要

背景

扣带回肿瘤位置深在,可能需要多种手术选择。我们专注于前扣带回肿瘤,因其具有特定的解剖和手术特征。

目的

通过详细描述和回顾我们的经验,评估不同的手术入路和适应证。

方法

这些手术入路包括单侧或联合双侧半球间入路:单侧加额上回切除术,或单侧加额极切除术。本回顾性分析的相关性在于这方面的文献极为有限。

结果

在过去 5 年中,我们对 38 例胶质瘤患者进行了手术。我们比较了以下变量:位置(扣带回前、扣带回后)、病理学(胶质母细胞瘤、其他胶质瘤)、大小(<4cm、≥4cm)、范围(单侧、双侧)和手术入路(单侧半球间、联合)。我们发现唯一有统计学意义的相关性是肿瘤位置(扣带回前)与双侧范围(P<0.01)。然而,在该区域,联合入路的采用率略高于扣带回后区域,且全切率更低(33% vs 76%,P<0.01)。28 例(66%)实现了大体全切除,且与联合入路显著相关(77% vs 50%,P<0.05)。

结论

对于前扣带回肿瘤,选择联合入路对于提高切除质量至关重要。我们建议在手术治疗扣带回前区大型肿瘤时采用联合入路。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验