Kersting M, Gierschmann A, Hauswaldt J, H-Pradier E
Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover.
Gesundheitswesen. 2010 Jun;72(6):323-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1249689. Epub 2010 May 20.
An advanced and integrative information technology (IT)-landscape is needed for optimal support of future processes in health-care, including health services research. Most researches in the primary care sector are based on data collected for reimbursement. The aim of this study is to show the limits and options of secondary analysis based on data that was exported via the "Behandlungsdatentransfer" (treatment data transport) BDT-interface in the software systems of German general practitioners and afterwards prepared for further research in SPSS. From the middle of 2005 to the end of 2007 all 168 teaching practices of the Hannover Medical School (MHH) were invited to join the study. Finally routine data from 28 practices could be collected successfully. The data from 139 other practices which had been collected for the project "Health Care in Practice" ("Medizinische Versorgung in der Praxis" - MedViP) was also added to the pool. The process of data preparation included a complete cycle from data collection, merging the data in a relational database system, via statistics and analysis to publishing and generating a feedback report for the participating practices. During the whole study the limits and options of this method were systematically identified. Of the 168 practices, 68 (40.5%) were interested to participate. From 28 (16.7%) physicians the data could be exported from their software systems. In 15 (8.9%) cases no collection was possible due to technical and in 26 (15.5%) to administrative reasons. The method of data extraction varied, as the BDT-interface was differently implemented by the software companies. Together with the MedViP data, the database at the MHH now consists of 167 practices with 974 304 patients and 12 555 943 treatments. For 44.1% of the 11 497 899 prescription entries an anatomic therapeutic chemical (ATC) code could be applied, by matching the entries to the master data from the Scientific Institute of Local Health-Care Funds ("Wissenschaftliches Instituts der Ortskrankenkassen" - WIdO). Periodically consistent sets of SPSS files could successfully be created for further research and feedback reports for the participating practices were generated as portable document format (PDF) files. The BDT-interface seems quite out of date, but can still reveal interesting information, especially on data about medical treatments and findings. Much of the data is contained in fields based on free text, which makes analysis difficult. Coded information, like agents, as ATC, could partially be extracted from the data, which afterwards was easy to prepare for further research. Quality and content of the data depend mainly on the data enterer, the physicians and their practice staff. Future research could be improved by more classified and coded data, which would better be transported through an interface more advanced than BDT.
为了最佳地支持包括卫生服务研究在内的未来医疗保健流程,需要一个先进且综合的信息技术(IT)格局。初级保健领域的大多数研究都基于为报销而收集的数据。本研究的目的是展示基于通过德国全科医生软件系统中的“治疗数据传输”(BDT)接口导出的数据进行二次分析的局限性和可能性,这些数据随后在SPSS中进行准备以用于进一步研究。从2005年年中到2007年底,汉诺威医学院(MHH)的所有168个教学诊所都被邀请参与该研究。最终成功收集到了来自28个诊所的常规数据。为“实践中的医疗保健”(“Medizinische Versorgung in der Praxis” - MedViP)项目收集的来自其他139个诊所的数据也被添加到数据池中。数据准备过程包括从数据收集、在关系数据库系统中合并数据,到统计分析、发布以及为参与诊所生成反馈报告的完整周期。在整个研究过程中,系统地确定了这种方法的局限性和可能性。在168个诊所中,68个(40.5%)有兴趣参与。从28个(16.7%)医生的软件系统中导出了数据。在15个(8.9%)案例中,由于技术原因无法收集数据,在26个(15.5%)案例中是由于行政原因。数据提取方法各不相同,因为软件公司对BDT接口的实现方式不同。连同MedViP数据,MHH的数据库现在包含167个诊所的974304名患者和12555943次治疗记录。对于11497899条处方记录中的44.1%,通过将记录与地方医疗保健基金科学研究所(“Wissenschaftliches Instituts der Ortskrankenkassen” - WIdO)的主数据进行匹配,可以应用解剖治疗化学(ATC)代码。可以成功创建定期一致的SPSS文件集以用于进一步研究,并为参与诊所生成便携式文档格式(PDF)的反馈报告。BDT接口似乎相当过时,但仍然可以揭示有趣的信息,特别是关于医疗治疗和检查结果的数据。许多数据包含在基于自由文本的字段中,这使得分析变得困难。像ATC这样的编码信息,如药剂,可以从数据中部分提取,之后很容易为进一步研究进行准备。数据的质量和内容主要取决于数据录入者、医生及其诊所工作人员。未来的研究可以通过更多分类和编码的数据得到改进,这些数据将通过比BDT更先进的接口更好地传输。