Centre for Pain Service, Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Disease, University of Bath, Bath BA1 1RL, UK.
J Behav Med. 2010 Oct;33(5):346-54. doi: 10.1007/s10865-010-9264-x. Epub 2010 May 26.
Recently, an expansion of traditional coping models for chronic pain has been offered. This model specifically includes acceptance of chronic pain, as well as the more general process of psychological flexibility. Psychological flexibility includes qualities of behavior such as acceptance and mindfulness, and the capacity to take committed and values-directed or goals-directed action, among other qualities. The present study was intended to refine and validate a measure of psychological flexibility, titled the Brief Pain Response Inventory (BPRI), and determine its relation with key indices of patient functioning. In total, 205 adults with chronic pain who were beginning a program of treatment completed a battery of self-report questionnaires. Exploratory factor analysis indicated the presence of two factors within the items of the BPRI: Flexible Action and Willing Engagement. Subscale and total scores were generally unrelated with patient background variables, although they were related to, and accounted for significant variance in, measures of emotional, physical, and psychosocial functioning. These analyses provide additional support for the relevance of psychological flexibility to the problem of chronic pain, as well as initial evidence for the BPRI as a measure of this process.
最近,人们对慢性疼痛的传统应对模式进行了扩展。该模型特别包括对慢性疼痛的接受,以及更普遍的心理灵活性过程。心理灵活性包括行为品质,如接受和正念,以及采取坚定的、以价值观为导向的或以目标为导向的行动的能力等品质。本研究旨在改进和验证一种名为“简要疼痛反应量表”(BPRI)的心理灵活性测量方法,并确定其与患者功能的关键指标的关系。共有 205 名患有慢性疼痛且正在开始治疗计划的成年人完成了一套自我报告问卷。探索性因素分析表明,BPRI 项目中存在两个因素:灵活行动和意愿参与。分量表和总分通常与患者背景变量无关,但与情感、身体和心理社会功能的测量指标相关,并解释了这些指标的显著差异。这些分析为心理灵活性与慢性疼痛问题的相关性提供了额外的支持,同时也为 BPRI 作为该过程的测量方法提供了初步证据。