Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Jun;92(6):1427-31. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00655.
Transtibial drilling techniques are widely used for arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament, most likely because they simplify femoral tunnel placement and reduce surgical time. Recently, however, there has been concern that this technique results in nonanatomically positioned bone tunnels, which may cause abnormal knee function. The purpose of this study was to use three-dimensional computed tomography models to visualize and quantify the positions of femoral and tibial tunnels in patients who underwent traditional transtibial single-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament and to compare these positions with reference data on anatomical tunnel positions.
Computed tomography scans were performed on thirty-two knees that had undergone transtibial single-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Three-dimensional computed tomography models were aligned into an anatomical coordinate system. Tibial tunnel aperture centers were measured in the anterior-to-posterior and medial-to-lateral directions on the tibial plateau. Femoral tunnel aperture centers were measured in anatomic posterior-to-anterior and proximal-to-distal directions and with the quadrant method. These measurements were compared with reference data on anatomical tunnel positions.
Tibial tunnels were located at a mean (and standard deviation) of 48.0% +/- 5.5% of the anterior-to-posterior plateau depth and a mean of 47.8% +/- 2.4% of the medial-to-lateral plateau width. Femoral tunnels were measured at a mean of 54.3% +/- 8.3% in the anatomic posterior-to-anterior direction and at a mean of 41.1% +/- 10.3% in the proximal-to-distal direction. With the quadrant method, femoral tunnels were measured at a mean of 37.2% +/- 5.5% from the proximal condylar surface (parallel to the Blumensaat line) and at a mean of 11.3% +/- 6.6% from the notch roof (perpendicular to the Blumensaat line). Tibial tunnels were positioned medial to the anatomic posterolateral position (p < 0.001). Femoral tunnels were positioned anterior to both anteromedial and posterolateral anatomic tunnel locations (p < 0.001 for both).
Transtibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failed to accurately place femoral and tibial tunnels within the native anterior cruciate ligament insertion site. If anatomical graft placement is desired, transtibial techniques should be performed only after careful identification of the native insertions. If anatomical positioning of the femoral tunnel cannot be achieved, then an alternative approach may be indicated.
关节镜下前交叉韧带重建中,胫骨隧道技术被广泛应用,可能是因为其简化了股骨隧道的定位并缩短了手术时间。然而,最近人们担心该技术会导致非解剖定位的骨隧道,从而引起膝关节功能异常。本研究旨在通过三维 CT 模型来观察和量化前交叉韧带传统胫骨单束重建患者的股骨和胫骨隧道位置,并与解剖隧道位置的参考数据进行比较。
对 32 例接受胫骨单束前交叉韧带重建的膝关节进行 CT 扫描。将三维 CT 模型与解剖坐标系对齐。在胫骨平台上,测量胫骨隧道开口中心在前后和内外方向上的位置。在解剖后前和近远方向上,以及用象限法测量股骨隧道开口中心的位置。将这些测量值与解剖隧道位置的参考数据进行比较。
胫骨隧道位于前-后平台深度的平均(标准差)48.0% +/- 5.5%和内侧-外侧平台宽度的平均 47.8% +/- 2.4%。股骨隧道在解剖后前方向的测量平均值为 54.3% +/- 8.3%,在近远方向的测量平均值为 41.1% +/- 10.3%。用象限法测量,股骨隧道距近侧髁表面(与 Blumensaat 线平行)的平均值为 37.2% +/- 5.5%,距髁间窝顶的平均值为 11.3% +/- 6.6%(与 Blumensaat 线垂直)。胫骨隧道位于解剖后外侧位置的内侧(p < 0.001)。股骨隧道位于前内和后外侧解剖隧道位置的前方(两者均 p < 0.001)。
胫骨前交叉韧带重建术未能准确地将股骨和胫骨隧道放置在原前交叉韧带止点处。如果需要解剖式移植物放置,应在仔细识别原止点后再行胫骨隧道技术。如果无法实现股骨隧道的解剖定位,则可能需要选择替代方法。