IBM Almaden Research Center, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, California 95120, USA.
J Phys Chem B. 2010 Jul 8;114(26):8631-45. doi: 10.1021/jp911701h.
Polarization cost is the energy needed to distort the wave function of a molecule from one appropriate to the gas phase to one appropriate for some condensed phase. Although it is not currently standard practice, polarization cost should be considered when deriving improved fixed charge force fields based on fits to certain types of experimental data and when using such force fields to compute observables that involve changes in molecular polarization. Building on earlier work, we present mathematical expressions and a method to estimate the effect of polarization cost on free energy and enthalpy implied by a charge model meant to represent a solvated state. The charge model can be any combination of point charges, higher-order multipoles, or even distributed charge densities, as long as they do not change in response to environment. The method is illustrated by computing the effect of polarization cost on free energies of hydration for the neutral amino acid side chain analogues as predicted using two popular fixed charge force fields and one based on electron densities computed using quantum chemistry techniques that employ an implicit model to represent aqueous solvent. From comparison of the computed and experimental hydration free energies, we find that two commonly used force fields are too underpolarized in their description of the solute-water interaction. On the other hand, a charge model based on the charge density from a hybrid density functional calculation that used an implicit model for aqueous solvent performs well for hydration free energies of these molecules after the correction for dipole polarization is applied. As such, an improved description of the density (e.g., B3LYP, MP2) in conjunction with an implicit solvent (e.g., PCM) or explicit solvent (e.g., QM/MM) approach may offer promise as a starting point for the development of improved fixed charge models for force fields.
极化代价是指将分子的波函数从适合气相的状态扭曲到适合某种凝聚相状态所需的能量。尽管目前并非标准做法,但在根据某些类型的实验数据拟合来推导改进的固定电荷力场时,以及在使用这种力场计算涉及分子极化变化的可观测值时,应该考虑极化代价。基于早期的工作,我们提出了数学表达式和一种方法,用于估计极化代价对电荷模型所表示的溶剂化状态的自由能和焓的影响。电荷模型可以是点电荷、更高阶多极子甚至分布电荷密度的任意组合,只要它们不会响应环境而改变。该方法通过计算两种流行的固定电荷力场和一种基于使用隐式模型表示水溶液的量子化学技术计算电子密度的电荷模型对中性氨基酸侧链类似物水合自由能的影响来说明。通过比较计算和实验水合自由能,我们发现两种常用的力场在描述溶质-水相互作用时极化程度太低。另一方面,基于使用隐式模型表示水溶液的杂化密度泛函计算得出的电荷密度的电荷模型在应用偶极极化校正后,对这些分子的水合自由能表现良好。因此,与隐式溶剂(例如 PCM)或显式溶剂(例如 QM/MM)方法结合使用改进的密度(例如 B3LYP、MP2)描述可能为开发改进的固定电荷力场模型提供一个有前途的起点。