Suppr超能文献

冲突引发冲突:执行控制、心理状态波动与边缘型人格障碍治疗中的治疗联盟。

Conflict begets conflict: executive control, mental state vacillations, and the therapeutic alliance in treatment of borderline personality disorder.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.

出版信息

Psychother Res. 2010 Jul;20(4):413-22. doi: 10.1080/10503301003636696.

Abstract

Clinicians routinely note the challenges involved in psychotherapy with individuals with BPD, yet little research exists on the therapeutic alliance with this population. An important question is, what patient factors contribute to a disturbed alliance with individuals with BPD? Executive attention has been identified as a mechanism of BPD, and mental state vacillations (e.g., idealization/denigration, incoherence in self-concept) are a hallmark of the disorder. The goals of this study were to examine the link between executive attention and the alliance and assess mental state vacillations as a mediator. Thirty-nine participants diagnosed with BPD, participating in a randomized clinical trial, were administered the Attentional Network Task (ANT). Early psychotherapy sessions were coded using the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI). In addition, six items were generated and coded representing in-session vacillations in mental states. Performance on the ANT was related to the alliance (r =.34, p =.035), as were in-session mental state vacillations (r =.59, p <.001). A model was supported in which in-session mental state vacillations mediated the relationship between executive attention and alliance. Executive attention was related to therapeutic alliance, and this relationship was found to be mediated by in-session mental state vacillations. These findings emphasize the importance of executive attention in the disorder and uncover a link between poor executive attention and mental state vacillations. Mental state vacillations as a mediator suggests a path in which poor executive attention leads to greater vacillations, which leads to poorer working alliance.

摘要

临床医生经常注意到与边缘型人格障碍个体进行心理治疗所涉及的挑战,但关于与该人群的治疗联盟的研究甚少。一个重要的问题是,哪些患者因素导致与边缘型人格障碍个体的联盟受到干扰?执行注意已被确定为边缘型人格障碍的一种机制,而心理状态波动(例如理想化/贬低、自我概念的不连贯性)是该障碍的标志。本研究的目的是检查执行注意与联盟之间的联系,并评估心理状态波动作为中介。39 名被诊断为边缘型人格障碍的参与者参加了一项随机临床试验,接受了注意网络任务(ANT)的测试。使用工作联盟量表(WAI)对早期心理治疗会议进行编码。此外,生成并编码了六个代表会议期间心理状态波动的项目。ANT 的表现与联盟有关(r =.34,p =.035),会议期间的心理状态波动也与联盟有关(r =.59,p <.001)。支持这样一种模型,即会议期间的心理状态波动中介了执行注意与联盟之间的关系。执行注意与治疗联盟有关,而这种关系被发现是由会议期间的心理状态波动介导的。这些发现强调了执行注意在该障碍中的重要性,并揭示了执行注意差与心理状态波动之间的联系。作为中介的心理状态波动表明,执行注意差导致更大的波动,从而导致更差的工作联盟。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验