Vascular Surgery Group, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, UK.
J Endovasc Ther. 2010 Jun;17(3):349-53. doi: 10.1583/09-2119.1.
To determine whether a pre-discharge duplex ultrasound scan detects early endoleaks that would not otherwise have been identified.
A retrospective review was conducted of all patients undergoing elective infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) at our center. These patients underwent intraoperative completion angiography, had a duplex ultrasound scan prior to hospital discharge, and were followed at 1, 3, and 6 months and at 6-month intervals thereafter. The outcome of any patients found to have an endoleak on a pre-discharge scan was studied.
There were 52 EVAR patients (50 men; mean age 76 years, range 61-87) with endoleak on the pre-discharge duplex: 17 (2.8%) type I, 28 (4.6%) type II, and 8 (1.3%) type III. Of these, only 7 of the type I and 2 of the type II leaks had been detected on completion angiography. Among the patients with type I endoleaks, 5 had resolution of the leak, 10 required further endovascular interventions, and 2 had open repair (1 died of aneurysm rupture). Two patients with failed endovascular repairs of the leak also had open repair. Fifteen of the 28 type II endoleaks resolved, 4 were treated with endovascular procedures, 1 had open repair, 7 are being observed, and 1 was lost to follow-up. Six of the 8 type III leaks resolved, 1 required open repair for an enlarging sac, and 1 is being observed.
Despite routine completion angiography, new endoleaks may be identified postoperatively, which suggests that more rigorous imaging at the point of completion angiography is required.
确定是否可以通过出院前的双功能超声扫描检测到否则无法识别的早期内漏。
对在本中心接受择期腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术(EVAR)的所有患者进行回顾性分析。这些患者在术中进行了完成血管造影,在出院前进行了双功能超声扫描,并在术后 1、3、6 个月以及此后每 6 个月进行随访。研究了在出院前扫描中发现内漏的任何患者的结果。
52 例 EVAR 患者(50 例男性;平均年龄 76 岁,范围 61-87 岁)在出院前的双功能超声扫描中发现内漏:17 例(2.8%)为 1 型,28 例(4.6%)为 2 型,8 例(1.3%)为 3 型。其中,仅在完成血管造影时检测到 7 例 1 型和 2 例 2 型漏。在 1 型内漏患者中,5 例漏口自行愈合,10 例需要进一步的血管内介入治疗,2 例需要开放修复(1 例死于动脉瘤破裂)。另外 2 例漏口的血管内修复失败,也进行了开放修复。28 例 2 型内漏中有 15 例缓解,4 例采用血管内治疗,1 例进行了开放修复,7 例正在观察中,1 例失访。8 例 3 型内漏中有 6 例缓解,1 例因瘤体增大需要开放修复,1 例正在观察中。
尽管进行了常规的完成血管造影,但术后仍可能发现新的内漏,这表明在完成血管造影时需要更严格的影像学检查。