Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, St Louis, MO, USA.
Psychiatr Danub. 2010 Jun;22(2):153-66.
After 30 years of clinical work and research based on categorical criteria for personality disorders (Diagnostic and Statistical manual of Mental Disorders - DSM IV TR) and (International Classification of Diseases - ICD 10th revision), a solid conceptual understanding and treatment of these disorders have not been established. For the field to move forward, it is imperative that future classifications introduce major revisions of the concept, diagnosis, and classification of personality disorders. This paper proposes one such revision. Based on recent advances in molecular biology and epigenetics, we define personality disorders as maladaptive syndromes developed trough person-environment interaction. We conceptualize maladaptation as a failure of integrative functions of personality (i.e., those that carry out adaptive processes) caused by strong biogenetic dispositions or by pathological environmental effects, or both. Hence, accurate diagnosis of personality disorder depends upon neurobiological (innate) and adaptive (interactive) etiological factors. We propose a 2-step diagnostic algorithm for personality disorders: adaptive processes (i.e., character) are used to diagnose maladaptation, whereas biological aspects (i.e., temperament) are used to specify dominant clinical presentation and for differential diagnosis. We suggest that the term "Personality Disorder" be replaced by a more appropriate term "Adaptation Disorder" as the latter reflects more accurately the real nature of the disorder and distributes the causality of maladaptive syndromes more evenly, between the person and the environment. Diagnostic, research, and treatment advantages of the proposed solution are discussed in some detail.
经过 30 年基于人格障碍分类标准(《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第 4 版修订版-DSM-IV-TR 和《国际疾病分类》第 10 版-ICD-10)的临床工作和研究,人们对这些障碍仍然没有形成稳固的概念理解和治疗方法。为了推动该领域的发展,未来的分类必须对人格障碍的概念、诊断和分类进行重大修订。本文提出了这样的修订建议。基于分子生物学和表观遗传学的最新进展,我们将人格障碍定义为个体通过人与环境的相互作用而发展出的适应不良综合征。我们将适应不良概念化为人格的整合功能(即执行适应过程的功能)的失败,这是由强烈的生物遗传倾向或病理性环境影响,或两者共同作用所致。因此,人格障碍的准确诊断取决于神经生物学(先天)和适应性(交互)病因因素。我们提出了人格障碍的两步诊断算法:适应性过程(即性格)用于诊断适应不良,而生物学方面(即气质)用于确定主要临床表现和进行鉴别诊断。我们建议用“适应障碍”来替代“人格障碍”一词,因为后者更准确地反映了该疾病的本质,并更公平地分配了适应不良综合征的因果关系,即个体和环境之间的因果关系。本文详细讨论了所提出的解决方案在诊断、研究和治疗方面的优势。