Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric hospital Dr. Ivan Barbot, 44 317 Popovaca, Croatia.
Psychiatr Danub. 2010 Jun;22(2):253-6.
Violence is an important social problem. Violence in the community has important social relevance for the political, criminal justice, and health care systems. Studies of homicide offenders have suggested a high prevalence of neurologic dysfunction due to organic brain damage such as traumatic brain injury, epilepsy and dementia have been observed to exhibit excessive violence. Moreover, violence in the mentally ill can be viewed as an important medical and mental health problem with significant implications for forensic psychiatry and the community. Although numerous previous studies showed that rate of violent behavior in the community is not much higher in patients with serious mental disorders (schizophrenia) than in healthy controls, that rate is substantially higher in patients with psychiatric comorbidity and substance abuse. A high proportion of patients in forensic psychiatric facilities are diagnosed with comorbidity, most often with schizophrenia, paranoid psychosis, organic brain syndrome, various personality disorders and comorbid substance abuse. These patients represent a high risk group for violence within forensic psychiatric facilities, and repetitive violent behavior in the community. Understanding the neurobiological basis of aggressive behavior clearly has important social and clinical implications. By introduction of neuroimaging studies (MRI, fMRI, PET, SPECT) as a useful tool in forensic psychiatry, the neurobiological aspect of violence is better understood. Previous studies have shown that individuals with frontotemporal brain dysfunction are frequently displaying antisocial behavior (disinhibition, impulsivity, lack of empathy) that justify the diagnosis of "acquired sociopathy/psychopathy". A correlation between the potential for impulsive aggression mediated by limbic brain structures, and the control of the aggression by frontotemporal brain regions has been shown. The individuals with such brain dysfunction have an increased risk of violent behavior and scored high on the Webster's and Hare's violence risk assessment scale. This article reviews the relationship between psychiatric comorbidity, violence risk assessment and neuroimaging in forensic psychiatry and showing the useful directions for future research, screening and prevention of violent behavior among mentally ill criminal offenders.
暴力是一个重要的社会问题。社区中的暴力对政治、刑事司法和医疗保健系统具有重要的社会相关性。对凶杀罪犯的研究表明,由于创伤性脑损伤、癫痫和痴呆等器质性脑损伤,存在较高的神经功能障碍发生率,这些患者被观察到表现出过度的暴力行为。此外,精神病患者的暴力行为可以被视为一个重要的医学和心理健康问题,对法医精神病学和社区都有重要影响。尽管许多先前的研究表明,严重精神障碍(精神分裂症)患者社区中的暴力行为发生率并不比健康对照组高很多,但在伴有精神共病和物质滥用的患者中,这一比率要高得多。在法医精神病学机构中,相当比例的患者被诊断为共病,最常见的是精神分裂症、偏执性精神病、器质性脑综合征、各种人格障碍和共病物质滥用。这些患者是法医精神病学机构内暴力和社区内重复性暴力行为的高风险群体。了解攻击行为的神经生物学基础显然具有重要的社会和临床意义。通过引入神经影像学研究(MRI、fMRI、PET、SPECT)作为法医精神病学的有用工具,可以更好地理解暴力的神经生物学方面。先前的研究表明,额叶颞叶脑功能障碍的个体经常表现出反社会行为(抑制、冲动、缺乏同理心),这可以诊断为“后天性反社会/精神病态”。已经表明,边缘脑结构介导的冲动攻击性与额叶颞叶脑区对攻击性的控制之间存在相关性。具有这种脑功能障碍的个体具有更高的暴力行为风险,并且在 Webster 和 Hare 的暴力风险评估量表上得分较高。本文综述了法医精神病学中精神共病、暴力风险评估和神经影像学之间的关系,并展示了未来研究、筛查和预防精神病犯罪者暴力行为的有用方向。