Suppr超能文献

推进关于儿童“体能测试”的辩论:或许我们驾驭的是匹错误的马。

Advancing the debate on 'fitness testing' for children: perhaps we're riding the wrong animal.

作者信息

Lloyd Meghann, Colley Rachel C, Tremblay Mark S

机构信息

Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2010 May;22(2):176-82. doi: 10.1123/pes.22.2.176.

Abstract

Assessment and evaluation are the cornerstones of the education and health fields. Assessment provides professionals with measures of educational achievement, health and functional status, and acts as an operational starting point for curricular and/or treatment planning and allows professionals to gain an understanding of the child to make informed decisions regarding education or treatment. Evaluation is woven into the fabric of North American schools, be it spelling tests, math tests, an evaluation of a child suspected of having a learning disability, or fitness testing in physical education class. There is little or no debate regarding the importance of assessment and evaluation in the cognitive domains in school (e.g., literacy and numeracy); however, assessment in physical education remains controversial. Physical and health education is mandated in most schools, just like spelling, math, science, and language arts; yet there is resistance to assessment in physical education. The purpose of this article is to further the debate surrounding fitness testing in schools.

摘要

评估与评价是教育和健康领域的基石。评估为专业人员提供教育成就、健康和功能状况的衡量标准,并作为课程和/或治疗计划的操作起点,使专业人员能够了解儿童,以便就教育或治疗做出明智的决定。评价贯穿于北美学校的方方面面,无论是拼写测试、数学测试、对疑似有学习障碍儿童的评估,还是体育课上的体能测试。在学校认知领域(如读写能力和算术能力),评估与评价的重要性几乎没有争议;然而,体育教育中的评估仍然存在争议。大多数学校都规定了体育与健康教育,就像拼写、数学、科学和语言艺术一样;然而,体育教育中的评估却遭到抵制。本文的目的是进一步推动围绕学校体能测试的讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验