Department of Economics, Universita' Roma Tre, via S D'Amico 77, 00145 Rome, Italy.
Stat Med. 2010 Jul 20;29(16):1696-709. doi: 10.1002/sim.3901.
We consider the problem of assessing new and existing technologies for their cost-effectiveness in the case where data on both costs and effects are available from a clinical trial, and we address it by means of the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. The main difficulty in these analyses is that cost data usually exhibit highly skew and heavy-tailed distributions, so that it can be extremely difficult to produce realistic probabilistic models for the underlying population distribution. Here, in order to integrate the uncertainty about the model into the analysis of cost data and into cost-effectiveness analyses, we consider an approach based on Bayesian model averaging (BMA) in the particular case of weak prior informations about the unknown parameters of the different models involved in the procedure. The main consequence of this assumption is that the marginal densities required by BMA are undetermined. However, in accordance with the theory of partial Bayes factors and in particular of fractional Bayes factors, we suggest replacing each marginal density with a ratio of integrals that can be efficiently computed via path sampling.
我们考虑在临床试验中既有成本数据又有效果数据的情况下,评估新的和现有的技术的成本效益的问题,并通过成本效益可接受性曲线来解决这个问题。在这些分析中,主要的困难是成本数据通常呈现出高度偏斜和重尾分布,因此很难为基础人群分布生成现实的概率模型。在这里,为了将模型的不确定性纳入成本数据分析和成本效益分析中,我们考虑了一种基于贝叶斯模型平均(BMA)的方法,特别是在关于所涉及的不同模型的未知参数的先验信息较弱的情况下。这个假设的主要结果是,BMA 所需的边缘密度是不确定的。然而,根据部分贝叶斯因子理论,特别是分数贝叶斯因子理论,我们建议用可以通过路径抽样有效地计算的积分比来代替每个边缘密度。