Suppr超能文献

在一个以机构收容为主、大多为重度智障的人群中,将《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)的诊断结果与成人智障者心理病理学量表(PIMRA)的因子结构进行比较。

DSM-III diagnoses compared with factor structure of the psychopathology instrument for mentally retarded adults (PIMRA), in an institutionalized, mostly severely retarded population.

作者信息

Linaker O

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, University of Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Res Dev Disabil. 1991;12(2):143-53. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(91)90003-b.

Abstract

The Psychopathology Instrument for Mentally Retarded Adults (PIMRA) was used to diagnose 163 mentally retarded adults in an institution according to DSM-III axis 1 categories. The relevant 49 items of the PIMRA were subsequently factor analysed. The factors were compared with the diagnoses to examine similarities or differences. The nine factors extracted contained 49.3% of the variance in the data, and were able to categorize correctly 69.3% of the cases with regards to diagnosis through a discriminant analysis. This is statistically different from chance expectations (p less than 0.001) and gives an inter-method agreement of 87.86% and a kappa of 0.62. Some of the factors were recognized as important aspects of traditional psychiatric categories. This makes these diagnostic categories more credible as valid diagnoses for persons from a population like the one studied.

摘要

《成人智障者精神病理学量表》(PIMRA)被用于依据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版轴I分类法,对一所机构中的163名成年智障者进行诊断。随后,对PIMRA相关的49个项目进行了因子分析。将这些因子与诊断结果进行比较,以检验其异同。提取出的九个因子包含了数据中49.3%的方差,并且通过判别分析能够在诊断方面正确地对69.3%的病例进行分类。这在统计学上与随机预期不同(p小于0.001),方法间一致性为87.86%,kappa值为0.62。其中一些因子被视为传统精神科类别中的重要方面。这使得这些诊断类别作为针对像所研究人群这样的有效诊断更具可信度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验