Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2010 Sep;76(1):95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.05.009. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
This study coupled results from biorelevant dissolution tests with in silico simulation technology to forecast in vivo oral absorption of micronized and nanosized aprepitant formulations in the pre- and post-prandial states. In vitro dissolution tests of the nanosized aprepitant formulation and micronized drug were performed in biorelevant and compendial media. An in silico physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed based on STELLA software using dissolution kinetics, standard gastrointestinal (GI) parameters and post-absorptive disposition parameters. GI parameters (gastric emptying rate and GI fluid volume) were varied according to the dosing conditions. Disposition parameters were estimated by fitting compartmental models to the in vivo oral PK data. Predictions of in vivo performance in each prandial state were evaluated using the AUC and C(max) generated from the simulated PK profiles. To predict oral absorption from the extremely fast dissolving nanosized aprepitant formulation, several variations on a previously published model were evaluated. Although models that assumed that the formulation behaved as an oral solution or that adjusted the dissolution kinetics according to the different numbers of particles per gram between micronized and nanosized aprepitant generated profiles similar to the observed in vivo data in the fed state, simulated profiles for the fasted state showed much faster absorption than that observed in the in vivo data. This appeared to result from the assumption of no absorption restrictions in those models. To better predict in vivo performance in both fasted and fed states, a model that adds permeability restrictions to absorption was applied. This model not only simulated the in vivo profiles for aprepitant well in both prandial states, but also predicted the dependency of the pharmacokinetics on the dose and the particle size of aprepitant. In conclusion, a model based on STELLA software combined with dissolution results in biorelevant media successfully forecasts the in vivo performance of both nanosized and micronized formulations of aprepitant in the fed and fasted states. Although dissolution is the primary limitation to the rate of absorption for micronized aprepitant, some permeability restrictions are revealed for the nanosized formulation. The results also indicate that biorelevant dissolution media have strong advantages over compendial media in forecasting the in vivo behavior of aprepitant.
本研究将生物相关溶出试验的结果与基于计算机的模拟技术相结合,以预测在空腹和进食状态下微米化和纳米化阿瑞匹坦制剂的体内口服吸收情况。在生物相关和药典介质中进行了纳米化阿瑞匹坦制剂和微米化药物的体外溶出试验。基于 STELLA 软件,利用溶解动力学、标准胃肠道 (GI) 参数和吸收后处置参数,建立了基于生理的药代动力学 (PBPK) 模型。GI 参数(胃排空率和 GI 液体量)根据给药条件而变化。通过将房室模型拟合到体内口服 PK 数据来估计处置参数。根据模拟 PK 曲线下面积 (AUC) 和 Cmax 预测每种进食状态下的体内性能。为了预测极快速溶解的纳米化阿瑞匹坦制剂的口服吸收,评估了先前发表的模型的几种变体。尽管假设制剂表现为口服溶液或根据微米化和纳米化阿瑞匹坦之间每克颗粒数的不同调整溶解动力学的模型生成的空腹状态下的曲线与观察到的体内数据相似,但模拟的空腹状态下的曲线显示吸收速度比体内数据观察到的更快。这似乎是由于这些模型中假设没有吸收限制。为了更好地预测空腹和进食状态下的体内性能,应用了一种向吸收添加渗透限制的模型。该模型不仅很好地模拟了阿瑞匹坦在两种进食状态下的体内曲线,还预测了药代动力学对阿瑞匹坦剂量和颗粒大小的依赖性。总之,基于 STELLA 软件并结合生物相关介质中的溶解结果的模型成功地预测了进食和空腹状态下阿瑞匹坦的纳米化和微米化制剂的体内性能。虽然对于微米化阿瑞匹坦,溶解是吸收速率的主要限制因素,但对于纳米化制剂,存在一些渗透限制。结果还表明,在预测阿瑞匹坦的体内行为方面,生物相关溶解介质比药典介质具有更强的优势。