Case Western Reserve University School of Nursing, Cleveland, OH 44106-4904, USA.
Chest. 2010 Dec;138(6):1340-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0292. Epub 2010 Jun 24.
Formal family meetings have been recommended as a useful approach to assist in goal setting, facilitate decision making, and reduce use of ineffective resources in the ICU. We examined patient outcomes before and after implementation of an intensive communication system (ICS) to test the effect of regular, structured formal family meetings on patient outcomes among long-stay ICU patients.
One hundred thirty-five patients receiving usual care and communication were enrolled as the control group, followed by enrollment of intervention patients (n = 346), from five ICUs. The ICS included a family meeting within 5 days of ICU admission and weekly thereafter. Each meeting discussed medical update, values and preferences, and goals of care; treatment plan; and milestones for judging effectiveness of treatment.
Using multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences between control and intervention patients in length of stay (LOS), the primary end point. Similarly, there were no significant differences in indicators of aggressiveness of care or treatment limitation decisions (ICU mortality, LOS, duration of ventilation, treatment limitation orders, or use of tracheostomy or percutaneous gastrostomy). Exploratory analysis suggested that in the medical ICUs, the intervention was associated with a lower prevalence of tracheostomy among patients who died or had do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders in place.
The negative findings of the main analysis, in combination with preliminary evidence of differences among types of unit, suggest that further examination of the influence of patient, family, and unit characteristics on the effects of a system of regular family meetings may be warranted. Despite the lack of influence on patient outcomes, structured family meetings may be an effective approach to meeting information and support needs.
ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01057238 ; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
正式的家庭会议已被推荐为一种有用的方法,以协助设定目标、促进决策,并减少 ICU 中无效资源的使用。我们在实施强化沟通系统 (ICS) 前后检查了患者的结局,以测试定期、结构化的正式家庭会议对 ICU 长期住院患者结局的影响。
135 名接受常规护理和沟通的患者被纳入对照组,随后纳入了来自五个 ICU 的干预组患者(n = 346)。ICS 包括 ICU 入院后 5 天内的家庭会议,并在此后每周进行一次。每次会议讨论医疗更新、价值观和偏好以及护理目标;治疗计划;以及判断治疗效果的里程碑。
使用多变量分析,对照组和干预组患者的住院时间(主要终点)没有显著差异。同样,在治疗的激进性或治疗限制决策的指标(ICU 死亡率、住院时间、通气持续时间、治疗限制医嘱、或使用气管切开术或经皮胃造口术)方面也没有显著差异。探索性分析表明,在医疗 ICU 中,干预与死亡或有不复苏医嘱的患者中气管切开术的患病率较低有关。
主要分析的阴性结果,结合不同类型单位之间的初步证据,表明可能需要进一步检查患者、家庭和单位特征对定期家庭会议系统影响的影响。尽管对患者结局没有影响,但结构化的家庭会议可能是满足信息和支持需求的有效方法。
ClinicalTrials.gov;编号:NCT01057238;网址:www.clinicaltrials.gov。