Suppr超能文献

芬兰的患者组织:数量不断增加,差异巨大。

Patient organizations in Finland: increasing numbers and great variation.

机构信息

STAKES National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Health Services Research, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2010 Sep;13(3):221-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00499.x. Epub 2010 Jun 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is very little research on patient organizations (POs), even though their numbers and influence seem to be increasing. The purpose of this study was to describe the establishment, membership, size, organization, decision making and basic funding of national POs in Finland.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

National POs (n = 130) were identified from their umbrella organizations and by Internet searches. Data were collected from POs' web pages (87% of POs had one), Finland's Slot Machine Association (RAY, an important public financier of POs), a relevant survey done by a local TV-company, and interviews and written materials of POs.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Some current national POs were established around the turn of the 19(th) century. The rate of establishment of new POs increased from the 1970s and particularly in the 1990s when POs were characterized by increasing specialization. POs focused on different patient groups and diseases and were founded by philanthropists, physicians, patients, parents and the drug industry. Members could be patients, patient relatives, health-care professionals and organizations. POs widely varied in memberships (20-145 000, in 2002) and in number of paid personnel (0-1395, in 2002), organizational structure and decision making. Interest groups and financiers were often represented in decision-making organs. Activities included mutual support and service production, and, increasingly, informing and lobbying. POs had wide domestic and international co-operation and networking. Drug industry marketing was visible on PO web pages. Budget sizes varied (4000-15 million euros, in 2001). The main public financier was RAY. The old national POs were large and part of national social and health care, but newer ones were often established for mutual support and lobbying. National POs are not uniform but characterized by great variation. The number of national POs is increasing suggesting tighter competition for financing and visibility in the future.

摘要

目的

尽管患者组织(POs)的数量和影响力似乎在不断增加,但针对它们的研究却很少。本研究旨在描述芬兰全国性 POs 的成立、成员、规模、组织、决策和基本资金情况。

背景和参与者

从伞式组织和互联网搜索中确定了全国性 POs(n=130)。从 POs 的网页(87%的 POs 有网页)、芬兰的彩票协会(RAY,POs 的一个重要公共资助者)、当地一家电视台进行的相关调查、POs 的访谈和书面材料中收集数据。

结果和结论

一些现有的全国性 POs 是在 19 世纪之交成立的。新 POs 的成立率从 20 世纪 70 年代开始增加,尤其是在 20 世纪 90 年代,当时 POs 的特点是专业化程度不断提高。POs 专注于不同的患者群体和疾病,由慈善家、医生、患者、家长和制药业创立。成员可以是患者、患者家属、医疗保健专业人员和组织。POs 在成员数量(20-145000,2002 年)和员工人数(0-1395,2002 年)、组织结构和决策方面差异很大。利益集团和资助者经常在决策机构中有代表。活动包括相互支持和服务生产,以及越来越多的信息和游说。POs 具有广泛的国内和国际合作和网络。制药业营销在 PO 网页上可见。预算规模各不相同(4000-1500 万欧元,2001 年)。主要的公共资助者是 RAY。旧的全国性 POs 规模较大,是国家社会和医疗保健的一部分,但较新的 POs 通常是为了相互支持和游说而成立的。全国性 POs 并不统一,而是具有很大的多样性。全国性 POs 的数量不断增加,这表明未来对资金和知名度的竞争将更加激烈。

相似文献

1
Patient organizations in Finland: increasing numbers and great variation.
Health Expect. 2010 Sep;13(3):221-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00499.x. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
2
Co-operation between patient organisations and the drug industry in Finland.
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Apr;70(8):1171-5. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.005. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
8
Physician organizations' use of behavioral nudges to influence physician behavior.
Am J Manag Care. 2022 Sep;28(9):473-476. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.89223.

引用本文的文献

1
Chronically ill patients' perspectives on support services and activities of patient organizations.
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2024 Sep 16;13(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13584-024-00635-7.
3
Representing Whom? U.K. Health Consumer and Patients' Organizations in the Policy Process.
J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Sep;15(3):341-349. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9859-4. Epub 2018 May 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Pharmaceuticals and the consumer movement: the ambivalences of 'patient power'.
Aust Health Rev. 2004 Nov 8;28(2):228-37. doi: 10.1071/ah040228.
2
Breast cancer in two regimes: the impact of social movements on illness experience.
Sociol Health Illn. 2004 Sep;26(6):845-74. doi: 10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00421.x.
4
Advocating voice: organisational, historical and social milieux of the Alzheimer's disease movement.
Sociol Health Illn. 2004 Sep;26(6):797-819. doi: 10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00419.x.
5
Health consumer groups in the UK: a new social movement?
Sociol Health Illn. 2004 Sep;26(6):737-56. doi: 10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00416.x.
6
Medical modernization, scientific research fields and the epistemic politics of health social movements.
Sociol Health Illn. 2004 Sep;26(6):695-709. doi: 10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00414.x.
7
Social movements in health: an introduction.
Sociol Health Illn. 2004 Sep;26(6):679-94. doi: 10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00413.x.
8
Influencing the national policy process: the role of health consumer groups.
Health Expect. 2004 Mar;7(1):18-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00238.x.
9
The role of women's advocacy groups in breast cancer.
Breast. 2003 Dec;12(6):420-3. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9776(03)00147-4.
10
The advocacy movement in gynecologic oncology.
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2002 Aug;18(3):231-5. doi: 10.1053/sonu.2002.34085.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验