Département des sciences animales, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
J Anim Sci. 2010 Oct;88(10):3280-90. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-2911. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
The objective of this work was to evaluate the reproductive performance of ewes exposed to a photoperiodic regimen consisting of continuous alternating 4-mo periods of long days (LD: 16 h of light/d) and short days (SHD: 8 h of light/d) in an accelerated lambing program of 3 lambings in 2 yr. A total of 211 prolific Rideau Arcott ewes were assigned to the photoperiodic treatment, whereas 37 ewes were maintained under natural annual variation in day length (control group). Ewes under the photoperiod regimen were divided into 4 subgroups (A, B, C, D). All these groups of ewes were exposed to the same light regimen, but the LD and SHD light sequences were staggered by 2 mo to permit the evaluation of the effect of time and season of mating on performance of the ewes treated with the photoperiod. The control ewes were treated with intravaginal sponges in the out-of-season breeding periods (conventional approach). Each group of ewes was studied over 3 reproductive cycles. Two groups of rams exposed to alternating 2-mo sequences of LD and SHD were used for mating. The short mean interval between ram introduction and conception for the groups exposed to artificial photoperiod (9.4 d) confirmed the effectiveness of the treatment to induce intense sexual activity. For the 12 breeding periods studied (8 in out-of-season and 4 in sexual season), fertility rate of the ewes treated with photoperiod, mated at various times of year, was 91.6%, which is comparable with the fertility normally seen in the natural breeding season. The number of lambs born/ewe remained constant across reproductive cycles and was greater in photoperiod-treated groups (2.81 vs. 2.27 for photoperiod and control groups, respectively; P = 0.0002). Groups exposed to photoperiod treatment obtained better fertility rate than the control group in out-of-season breeding (91.1 vs. 76.3%; P = 0.016). Ewes managed under the photoperiod regimen produced 1.38 lambings/yr and 69% of them lambed 3 times in 2 yr. Overall, the ewes in the photoperiodic treatment produced annually 3.78 lambs/ewe. The reproductive performances achieved throughout the years indicate that the photoperiodic program tested, consisting of continuous alternating 4-mo periods of LD and SHD, allows control of the annual reproductive cycles in ewes.
本研究的目的是评估在一个加速产羔计划中,母羊经历连续 4 个月的长日(LD:16 小时光照/天)和短日(SDD:8 小时光照/天)光照周期处理后的繁殖性能。总共 211 只繁殖力强的罗德尔阿卡特母羊被分配到光周期处理组,而 37 只母羊则维持在自然的年度日长变化下(对照组)。根据光周期处理方案,母羊被分为 4 个亚组(A、B、C、D)。所有这些组的母羊都接受相同的光照方案,但 LD 和 SDD 的光照序列错开了 2 个月,以评估在光周期处理下,交配时间和季节对母羊性能的影响。对照组母羊在非季节性配种期使用阴道内海绵(常规方法)处理。每组母羊研究了 3 个繁殖周期。两组公羊暴露在 LD 和 SHD 的 2 个月交替序列中进行交配。暴露于人工光周期的母羊的公羊引入和受孕之间的平均间隔较短(9.4 天),这证实了该处理方案能够有效诱导强烈的性活动。在研究的 12 个配种期(8 个在非季节性配种期,4 个在季节性配种期)中,在不同时间配种的光周期处理母羊的受胎率为 91.6%,这与自然繁殖季节的正常受胎率相当。在繁殖周期中,每只母羊的产羔数保持不变,且在光周期处理组中更高(分别为 2.81 和 2.27;P=0.0002)。在非季节性配种中,暴露于光周期处理的母羊的受胎率高于对照组(91.1%对 76.3%;P=0.016)。根据光周期方案管理的母羊每年产羔 1.38 次,其中 69%的母羊在 2 年内产羔 3 次。总的来说,光周期处理组的母羊每年产羔 3.78 只/只。多年来的繁殖性能表明,所测试的连续 4 个月的 LD 和 SHD 交替光周期方案可以控制母羊的年度繁殖周期。