Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Department of Neurophysiology, Laboratory of Psychophysiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Soc Neurosci. 2011;6(1):98-107. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2010.490665. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
Our own name, due to its high social relevance, is supposed to have a unique status in our information processing. However, demonstrating this phenomenon empirically proves difficult as famous and unknown names, to which self-name is often compared in the studies, may differ from self-name not only in terms of the 'me vs. not-me' distinction, but also as regards their emotional content and frequency of occurrence in everyday life. In this fMRI study, apart from famous and unknown names we used the names of the most important persons in our subjects' lives. When compared to famous or unknown names recognition, self-name recognition was associated with robust activations in widely distributed bilateral network including fronto-temporal, limbic and subcortical structures, however, when compared to significant other's name, the activations were present specifically in the right inferior frontal gyrus. In addition, the significant other's name produced a similar pattern of activations to the one activated by self-name. These results suggest that the differences between own and other's name processing may rather be quantitative than qualitative in nature.
我们的名字由于其高度的社会相关性,应该在我们的信息处理中具有独特的地位。然而,要证明这一现象在经验上是困难的,因为在研究中,与自我名字经常进行比较的著名和不知名的名字,不仅在“我与非我”的区别方面,而且在情感内容和日常生活中的出现频率方面,都可能与自我名字不同。在这项 fMRI 研究中,除了著名和不知名的名字,我们还使用了研究对象生命中最重要的人的名字。与著名或不知名的名字识别相比,自我名字识别与广泛分布的双侧网络中的激活有关,包括额颞叶、边缘和皮质下结构,但与重要他人的名字相比,激活仅存在于右侧下额回。此外,重要他人的名字产生的激活模式与自我名字的激活模式相似。这些结果表明,自己和他人的名字处理之间的差异可能更多是数量上的,而不是性质上的。