Henes Frank Oliver G, Groth Michael, Regier Marc, Bley Thorsten, Nagel Hans-Dieter, Adam Gerhard, Begemann Philipp G C
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Emerg Radiol. 2010 Nov;17(6):465-71. doi: 10.1007/s10140-010-0887-6. Epub 2010 Jul 4.
The objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility of prospectively respiratory-triggered CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for detection of pulmonary embolism (PE) in a porcine model. A free-breathing respiratory-triggered multislice CTPA (120 kV, 140 mAs(eff), 2.5-mm slice thickness) and two CTPA in breath-hold technique (120 kV, 140 mAs(eff.) and 250mAs(eff), 1-mm and 3-mm image reconstruction) were performed in six pigs with pulmonary embolism. Diagnostic accuracy was computed, and differences in detection rates between both techniques were assessed on a per-embolus basis with the Wilcoxon test. Thin-sliced 1-mm images, acquired with 250mAs(eff), served as the standard of reference. Respiratory-triggered CTPA reached high diagnostic accuracy in detection of lobar and segmental PE equal to the results with the breath-hold technique (p > 0.05). For detection of subsegmental emboli, standard breath-hold techniques performed significantly better than respiratory-gated CTPA (sensitivity, 68.3% versus 24.4%; p < 0.05). Free-breathing respiratory-triggered CTPA is feasible for detection of lobar and segmental PE, with diagnostic accuracy equivalent to that of a standard CTPA in breath-hold. Although this technique is not recommended for assessment of emboli in the subsegmental vasculature, prospective respiratory-triggered CTPA may be of added value in patients who cannot hold their breath appropriately for CTPA scanning.
本研究的目的是探讨前瞻性呼吸触发CT肺动脉造影(CTPA)在猪模型中检测肺栓塞(PE)的可行性。对6只患有肺栓塞的猪进行了自由呼吸呼吸触发多层CTPA(120 kV,140 mAs(有效),2.5毫米层厚)以及两种屏气技术的CTPA(120 kV,140 mAs(有效)和250 mAs(有效),1毫米和3毫米图像重建)。计算诊断准确性,并使用Wilcoxon检验在每个栓子的基础上评估两种技术之间检测率的差异。以250 mAs(有效)采集的1毫米薄层图像作为参考标准。呼吸触发CTPA在检测叶和段PE方面达到了较高的诊断准确性,与屏气技术的结果相当(p>0.05)。对于亚段栓子的检测,标准屏气技术的表现明显优于呼吸门控CTPA(敏感性分别为68.3%和24.4%;p<0.05)。自由呼吸呼吸触发CTPA对于检测叶和段PE是可行的,其诊断准确性与标准屏气CTPA相当。尽管不推荐该技术用于评估亚段血管系统中的栓子,但前瞻性呼吸触发CTPA对于无法配合屏气进行CTPA扫描的患者可能具有附加价值。