Kent School of Social Work, University of Louisville, Louisville, USA.
J Marital Fam Ther. 2010 Jul 1;36(3):307-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00141.x.
The gap between clinical research and practice is a major challenge facing marriage and family therapy (MFT) training programs. Until now, the answer to bridge this gap has primarily been the Boulder Scientist-Practitioner Model. Although realistic for doctoral students, it may not be a good fit for MFT master's students who have primarily clinical career ambitions-which we believe is a legitimate and positive career choice. The following article articulates a "research informed" perspective as opposed to the scientist-practitioner framework as a research-training model for clinically oriented MFT master's programs. After articulating the similarities and differences between these two approaches, the authors outline 10 practical ideas to integrate research into programs that desire to remain clinical in focus, but also research informed.
临床研究与实践之间的差距是婚姻和家庭治疗(MFT)培训项目面临的主要挑战。到目前为止,弥合这一差距的主要方法一直是博尔德学者-实践者模式。尽管对于博士生来说是现实的,但对于主要有临床职业抱负的 MFT 硕士学生来说,这可能不是一个很好的选择——我们认为这是一个合理且积极的职业选择。本文阐述了一种“研究知情”的观点,而不是学者-实践者框架,作为以临床为导向的 MFT 硕士课程的研究培训模式。在阐述了这两种方法的异同之后,作者概述了 10 个实用的想法,将研究纳入那些希望保持临床重点但又具有研究意识的项目中。