U.O. Oncologia Medica 2 Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011 Jun;78(3):243-51. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.06.003. Epub 2010 Jul 8.
Scarce data are available about safety and efficacy of cetuximab in elderly metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients.
We retrospectively analysed 54 irinotecan-refractory mCRC patients aged≥70 years treated with cetuximab plus irinotecan and evaluated clinical outcome according to KRAS and BRAF mutational status.
Median age was 73 years (70-82). Main grade 3-4 toxicities were skin rash (15%), diarrhea (19%) and neutropenia (13%). Irinotecan dose reduction was necessary in 39% of patients. Fifty-two (96%) patients were analysed for KRAS and BRAF status. The 29 KRAS wild-type patients achieved better RR (31% vs 4%; p=0.030) and median PFS (4.21 months vs 3.95 months; p=0.034; HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.27-0.95) when compared with KRAS mutated ones. RR (41% vs 3%; p=0.001) and mPFS (4.57 months vs 3.78 months, p=0.001; HR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.19-0.66) were significantly higher among the 22 KRAS and BRAF wild-type patients compared to the 30 KRAS or BRAF mutated ones.
Cetuximab plus irinotecan has a favourable safety profile in elderly mCRC patients, but a reduced dose of irinotecan should be considered. Such a combination can be a useful option for elderly KRAS and BRAF wild-type patients.
有关老年转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者使用西妥昔单抗的安全性和疗效的数据很少。
我们回顾性分析了 54 例年龄≥70 岁的对伊立替康耐药的 mCRC 患者,他们接受了西妥昔单抗联合伊立替康治疗,并根据 KRAS 和 BRAF 突变状态评估了临床结果。
中位年龄为 73 岁(70-82 岁)。主要的 3-4 级毒性为皮疹(15%)、腹泻(19%)和中性粒细胞减少(13%)。39%的患者需要减少伊立替康的剂量。52 例(96%)患者进行了 KRAS 和 BRAF 状态分析。29 例 KRAS 野生型患者的缓解率(31%比 4%;p=0.030)和中位无进展生存期(4.21 个月比 3.95 个月;p=0.034;HR:0.50,95%CI:0.27-0.95)均优于 KRAS 突变型患者。与 30 例 KRAS 或 BRAF 突变型患者相比,22 例 KRAS 和 BRAF 野生型患者的缓解率(41%比 3%;p=0.001)和中位无进展生存期(4.57 个月比 3.78 个月,p=0.001;HR:0.35,95%CI:0.19-0.66)显著更高。
西妥昔单抗联合伊立替康在老年 mCRC 患者中具有良好的安全性,但应考虑减少伊立替康的剂量。对于老年 KRAS 和 BRAF 野生型患者,这种联合治疗可能是一种有用的选择。