Pathology Queensland, Department of Chemical Pathology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Qld, Australia.
Pathology. 2010;42(5):402-8. doi: 10.3109/00313025.2010.495246.
The laboratory measurement of cardiac troponin (cTn) concentration is a critical tool in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (MI). Current cTnI assays produce different absolute troponin numbers and use different clinical cut-off values; hence cTnI values cannot be interchanged, with consequent confusion for clinicians. A recent Australian study compared patient results for seven cTnI assays and showed that between-method variation was approximately 2- to 5-fold. A major reason for poor method agreement is the lack of a suitable common reference material for the calibration of cTnI assays by manufacturers. Purified complexed troponin material lacks adequate commutability for all assays; hence a serum-based secondary reference material is required for cTnI with value assignment by a higher order reference measurement procedure. There is considerable debate about how best to achieve comparability of results for heterogeneous analytes such as cTnI, whether it should be via the harmonisation or the standardisation process. Whereas harmonisation depends upon consensus value assignment and uses those commercial methods which give the closest agreement at the time, standardisation comes closer to the true value through a reference measurement system that is based upon long-term calibration traceability. The current paper describes standardisation efforts by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group on Standardization of cTnI (IFCC WG-TNI) to establish a reference immunoassay measurement procedure for cTnI of a higher order than current commercial immunoassay methods and a commutable secondary reference material for cTnI to which companies can reference their calibration materials.
心肌肌钙蛋白(cTn)浓度的实验室检测是诊断急性心肌梗死(MI)的重要工具。目前的 cTnI 检测方法产生不同的绝对肌钙蛋白数值,并使用不同的临床截断值;因此,cTnI 值不能互换,这给临床医生带来了困惑。最近的一项澳大利亚研究比较了七种 cTnI 检测方法的患者结果,结果显示方法间的变异约为 2-5 倍。方法一致性差的一个主要原因是制造商在 cTnI 检测校准方面缺乏合适的通用参考物质。纯化的复合肌钙蛋白材料对所有检测方法的可互换性不足;因此,需要一种基于血清的二级参考物质,用于赋值的方法应为高级参考测量程序。对于像 cTnI 这样的异质分析物,如何最好地实现结果的可比性存在很大的争议,是通过协调还是标准化过程。协调取决于共识赋值,并使用当时最接近的商业方法,而标准化则通过基于长期校准可追溯性的参考测量系统更接近真实值。本文描述了国际临床化学和实验室医学联合会(IFCC)cTnI 标准化工作组(IFCC WG-TNI)为建立高于当前商业免疫分析方法的 cTnI 参考免疫分析测量程序以及可互换的 cTnI 二级参考物质所做的标准化工作,公司可以将其校准材料与该参考物质进行参考。