Ivanov V A, Gavrilenko A V, Terēkhin S A, Piven' A V, Kuklin A V
Angiol Sosud Khir. 2010;16(1):144-51.
Carotid artery stenosis has over the last decade been treated increasingly more often by means of angioplasty and stenting, with the indications for these interventions being gradually broadening. The authors review and analyse the results of multicenter randomized studies and registers regarding carotid artery stent grafting and carotid endarterectomy (CAVATAS, SAPPHIRE, ARCHeR, EVA-3S, CaRESS, SPACE, BEACH, CABERNET, CREATE Pivotal). Presented herein are the outcomes of management of symptomatic and symptom-free patients running both usual and high surgical risks for carotid endarterectomy. The commonly accepted criteria for surgical risks are conventionally subdivided into the absolute and relative ones (i.e., correction-prone). Carotid stenting turned out to be superior to carotid endarterectomy in patients running a high surgical risk.
在过去十年中,颈动脉狭窄越来越多地通过血管成形术和支架置入术进行治疗,这些干预措施的适应症也在逐渐扩大。作者回顾并分析了关于颈动脉支架植入术和颈动脉内膜切除术的多中心随机研究及登记结果(CAVATAS、SAPPHIRE、ARCHeR、EVA - 3S、CaRESS、SPACE、BEACH、CABERNET、CREATE Pivotal)。本文介绍了有症状和无症状患者的治疗结果,这些患者接受颈动脉内膜切除术时面临常规和高手术风险。手术风险的公认标准通常分为绝对风险和相对风险(即易于纠正的风险)。结果表明,在手术风险高的患者中,颈动脉支架置入术优于颈动脉内膜切除术。