Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉狭窄患者行颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术的对比研究(第一部分)

[Comparative studies of carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting in patients with coronary artery stenosis (part I)].

作者信息

Ivanov V A, Gavrilenko A V, Terēkhin S A, Piven' A V, Kuklin A V

出版信息

Angiol Sosud Khir. 2010;16(1):144-51.

Abstract

Carotid artery stenosis has over the last decade been treated increasingly more often by means of angioplasty and stenting, with the indications for these interventions being gradually broadening. The authors review and analyse the results of multicenter randomized studies and registers regarding carotid artery stent grafting and carotid endarterectomy (CAVATAS, SAPPHIRE, ARCHeR, EVA-3S, CaRESS, SPACE, BEACH, CABERNET, CREATE Pivotal). Presented herein are the outcomes of management of symptomatic and symptom-free patients running both usual and high surgical risks for carotid endarterectomy. The commonly accepted criteria for surgical risks are conventionally subdivided into the absolute and relative ones (i.e., correction-prone). Carotid stenting turned out to be superior to carotid endarterectomy in patients running a high surgical risk.

摘要

在过去十年中,颈动脉狭窄越来越多地通过血管成形术和支架置入术进行治疗,这些干预措施的适应症也在逐渐扩大。作者回顾并分析了关于颈动脉支架植入术和颈动脉内膜切除术的多中心随机研究及登记结果(CAVATAS、SAPPHIRE、ARCHeR、EVA - 3S、CaRESS、SPACE、BEACH、CABERNET、CREATE Pivotal)。本文介绍了有症状和无症状患者的治疗结果,这些患者接受颈动脉内膜切除术时面临常规和高手术风险。手术风险的公认标准通常分为绝对风险和相对风险(即易于纠正的风险)。结果表明,在手术风险高的患者中,颈动脉支架置入术优于颈动脉内膜切除术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验