Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 15;363(3):221-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0909905.
Cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoids have been the cornerstone of remission-induction therapy for severe antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis for 40 years. Uncontrolled studies suggest that rituximab is effective and may be safer than a cyclophosphamide-based regimen.
We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority trial of rituximab (375 mg per square meter of body-surface area per week for 4 weeks) as compared with cyclophosphamide (2 mg per kilogram of body weight per day) for remission induction. Glucocorticoids were tapered off; the primary end point was remission of disease without the use of prednisone at 6 months.
Nine centers enrolled 197 ANCA-positive patients with either Wegener's granulomatosis or microscopic polyangiitis. Baseline disease activity, organ involvement, and the proportion of patients with relapsing disease were similar in the two treatment groups. Sixty-three patients in the rituximab group (64%) reached the primary end point, as compared with 52 patients in the control group (53%), a result that met the criterion for noninferiority (P<0.001). The rituximab-based regimen was more efficacious than the cyclophosphamide-based regimen for inducing remission of relapsing disease; 34 of 51 patients in the rituximab group (67%) as compared with 21 of 50 patients in the control group (42%) reached the primary end point (P=0.01). Rituximab was also as effective as cyclophosphamide in the treatment of patients with major renal disease or alveolar hemorrhage. There were no significant differences between the treatment groups with respect to rates of adverse events.
Rituximab therapy was not inferior to daily cyclophosphamide treatment for induction of remission in severe ANCA-associated vasculitis and may be superior in relapsing disease. (Funded by the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Genentech, and Biogen; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00104299.)
环磷酰胺和糖皮质激素作为诱导缓解治疗药物已经在抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)相关性血管炎的治疗中使用了 40 年。非对照研究提示利妥昔单抗有效,且可能比环磷酰胺方案更安全。
我们进行了一项多中心、随机、双盲、双模拟、非劣效性试验,比较了利妥昔单抗(每周 375mg/m2,共 4 周)与环磷酰胺(每天 2mg/kg,共 6 个月)诱导缓解治疗 ANCA 阳性的韦格纳肉芽肿或显微镜下多血管炎患者的疗效。糖皮质激素逐渐减量;主要终点是 6 个月时无泼尼松治疗的疾病缓解。
9 个中心共纳入 197 例 ANCA 阳性的韦格纳肉芽肿或显微镜下多血管炎患者。两组患者的基线疾病活动度、器官受累及复发患者的比例相似。利妥昔单抗组 63 例(64%)患者达到主要终点,而对照组为 52 例(53%),该结果符合非劣效性标准(P<0.001)。与环磷酰胺组相比,利妥昔单抗组诱导复发疾病缓解更有效,利妥昔单抗组 51 例中有 34 例(67%)患者达到主要终点,而对照组 50 例中有 21 例(42%)(P=0.01)。利妥昔单抗在治疗伴有严重肾脏疾病或肺泡出血的患者方面与环磷酰胺同样有效。两组不良事件发生率无显著差异。
与每日环磷酰胺治疗相比,利妥昔单抗治疗在诱导严重 ANCA 相关性血管炎缓解方面不劣效,且在复发疾病中可能更有效。(由美国国立过敏和传染病研究所、基因泰克和百健资助;ClinicalTrials.gov 注册号:NCT00104299。)