Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2010 Sep;65(9):942-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06473.x.
We compared the effect of delivering fluid warmed using two methods in 76 adult patients having short duration surgery. All patients received a litre of crystalloid delivered either at room temperature, warmed using an in-line warming device or pre-warmed in a warming cabinet for at least 8 h. The tympanic temperature of those receiving fluid at room temperature was 0.4 °C lower on arrival in recovery when compared with those receiving fluid from a warming cabinet (p = 0.008). Core temperature was below the hypothermic threshold of 36.0 °C in seven (14%) patients receiving either type of warm fluid, compared to eight (32%) patients receiving fluid at room temperature (p = 0.03). The administration of 1 l warmed fluid to patients having short duration general anaesthesia results in higher postoperative temperatures. Pre-warmed fluid, administered within 30 min of its removal from a warming cabinet, is as efficient at preventing peri-operative hypothermia as that delivered through an in-line warming system.
我们比较了在 76 名手术时间较短的成年患者中使用两种方法加热液体的效果。所有患者均输注 1 升晶体液,室温下输注,或使用在线加热装置加热,或在保温箱中预热至少 8 小时。与从保温箱中输注液体的患者相比,接受室温下液体的患者在到达复苏室时的鼓膜温度低 0.4°C(p=0.008)。与接受室温液体的患者(8/32,32%)相比,接受任何一种温热液体的患者中有 7 名(14%)核心温度低于 36.0°C 的低体温阈值(p=0.03)。对接受全身麻醉时间较短的患者输注 1 升温热液体可导致术后体温升高。从保温箱中取出后 30 分钟内输注预加热的液体,与通过在线加热系统输送液体一样有效预防围手术期低体温。