Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 2, Helsinki 00029, Finland.
Crit Care. 2010;14(4):R139. doi: 10.1186/cc9203. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
Previous human studies have shown low activity of protein C (APC) in severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). This, together with the findings in animal models, suggests that activated protein C (APC) may protect against pancreatic injury and ameliorate the disease. We, therefore, evaluated its effect on multiple organ dysfunction (MOD) measured by the SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) and on organ-failure-free days, and the safety of APC in SAP.
A prospective double blind randomized pilot study was use. The study occurred in one university hospital tertiary intensive care unit (ICU) with eight beds. The patients were chosen according to the following inclusion criteria: 1) Those admitted to the hospital < 96 h from the onset of pain, 2) Those who had a three-fold increase in serum amylase over normal upper range or/and in whom computed tomography (CT) verification of SAP was noted, 3) Those who had one or more organ dysfunction (OD), and 4) Those in whom less than 48 hours had passed since their first OD. Of a total of 215 adult patients with SAP screened between June 2003 and August 2007, 158 fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. After exclusions 32 patients were randomized to the study. The intervention consisted of APC (N = 16) administered intravenously for 96 hours with a dose of 24 μg/kg/hour or placebo (N = 16) with a similar infusion rate. The sample size for the study was calculated according to the primary end-point: the change in SOFA during study drug infusion (Days 0 and 5). Comparisons between the study groups were performed using patient-related changes and calculation of difference in means (DIM, 95% CIs) and regarding categorical variables with Fisher's exact test. For all comparisons P < 0.05 was considered significant.
No serious bleeding was detected clinically or by CT scans in either group. No significant difference in SOFA score change between the APC and placebo groups was found (difference in means (DIM) +2.3, 95% CI -0.7 to +5.3). Treatment with APC was associated with an increase in serum levels of both total and conjugated bilirubin. No differences in ventilator-free days, in renal replacement therapy-free days, in vasopressor-free days, or in days alive outside the hospital were detected.
No serious bleeding or differences in the evolution of MOD were detected between APC and the placebo. Instead we found an increase in serum bilirubin in the APC group compared to the placebo group in patients with SAP.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01017107.
之前的人类研究表明,严重急性胰腺炎(SAP)患者的蛋白 C(APC)活性较低。这与动物模型的研究结果一起表明,活化蛋白 C(APC)可能对胰腺损伤具有保护作用,并改善疾病。因此,我们评估了其对 SOFA(序贯器官衰竭评估)测量的多器官功能障碍(MOD)和无器官衰竭天数的影响,以及 SAP 中 APC 的安全性。
采用前瞻性双盲随机试验研究。该研究在一家拥有 8 张床位的大学医院重症监护病房(ICU)进行。根据以下纳入标准选择患者:1)从疼痛发作开始<96 小时入院的患者,2)血清淀粉酶升高三倍以上且经计算机断层扫描(CT)证实为 SAP 的患者,3)存在一个或多个器官功能障碍(OD)的患者,以及 4)首次 OD 后<48 小时的患者。在 2003 年 6 月至 2007 年 8 月期间筛查的 215 名成人 SAP 患者中,共有 158 名符合研究纳入标准。排除后,32 名患者被随机分配到研究中。干预措施包括 APC(n = 16)静脉输注 96 小时,剂量为 24 μg/kg/h,或安慰剂(n = 16),输注速度相似。根据主要终点(研究药物输注期间 SOFA 的变化[第 0 天和第 5 天])计算研究样本量。使用与患者相关的变化和均值差异(DIM,95%置信区间)计算比较研究组之间的差异,并对分类变量进行 Fisher 确切检验。所有比较均认为 P<0.05 有统计学意义。
两组均未发现临床或 CT 扫描显示严重出血。APC 组和安慰剂组的 SOFA 评分变化无显著差异(差异均值(DIM)+2.3,95%置信区间-0.7 至+5.3)。APC 治疗与总胆红素和结合胆红素水平的升高有关。未发现呼吸机脱机天数、肾替代治疗脱机天数、血管加压素脱机天数或院外存活天数的差异。
与安慰剂相比,APC 组和安慰剂组均未发现严重出血或 MOD 演变的差异。相反,我们发现 SAP 患者 APC 组的血清胆红素水平较安慰剂组升高。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01017107。