Suppr超能文献

大剂量指南:一种基于碳水化合物范围选择的新型胰岛素大剂量给药决策支持工具。

Bolus guide: a novel insulin bolus dosing decision support tool based on selection of carbohydrate ranges.

作者信息

Shapira Gali, Yodfat Ofer, HaCohen Arava, Feigin Paul, Rubin Richard

机构信息

Medingo, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Jul 1;4(4):893-902. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400418.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimal continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy emphasizes the relationship between insulin dose and carbohydrate consumption. One widely used tool (bolus calculator) requires the user to enter discrete carbohydrate values; however, many patients might not estimate carbohydrates accurately. This study assessed carbohydrate estimation accuracy in type 1 diabetes CSII users and compared simulated blood glucose (BG) outcomes using the bolus calculator and the "bolus guide," an alternative system based on ranges of carbohydrate load.

METHODS

Patients (n = 60) estimated the carbohydrate load of a representative sample of meals of known carbohydrate value. The estimated error distribution [coefficient of variation (CV)] was the basis for a computer simulation (n = 1.6 million observations) of insulin recommendations for the bolus guide and bolus calculator, translated into outcome blood glucose (OBG) ranges (< or =60, 61-200, >201 mg/dl). Patients (n = 30) completed questionnaires assessing satisfaction with the bolus guide.

RESULTS

The CV of typical meals ranged from 27.9% to 44.5%. The percentage of simulated OBG for the calculator and the bolus guide in the <60 mg/dl range were 20.8% and 17.2%, respectively, and 13.8% and 15.8%, respectively, in the >200 mg/dl range. The mean and median scores of all bolus guide satisfaction items and ease of learning and use were 4.17 and 4.2, respectively (of 5.0).

CONCLUSION

The bolus guide recommendation based on carbohydrate range selection is substantially similar to the calculator based on carbohydrate point estimation and appears to be highly accepted by type 1 diabetes insulin pump users.

摘要

背景

最佳持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)疗法强调胰岛素剂量与碳水化合物摄入量之间的关系。一种广泛使用的工具(大剂量计算器)要求用户输入离散的碳水化合物值;然而,许多患者可能无法准确估算碳水化合物含量。本研究评估了1型糖尿病CSII使用者估算碳水化合物的准确性,并比较了使用大剂量计算器和“大剂量指南”(一种基于碳水化合物摄入量范围的替代系统)模拟的血糖(BG)结果。

方法

患者(n = 60)估算了已知碳水化合物值的代表性餐食样本的碳水化合物含量。估计误差分布[变异系数(CV)]是对大剂量指南和大剂量计算器的胰岛素推荐进行计算机模拟(n = 160万次观察)的基础,转化为血糖结果(OBG)范围(≤60、61 - 200、>201mg/dl)。患者(n = 30)完成了评估对大剂量指南满意度的问卷。

结果

典型餐食的CV范围为27.9%至44.5%。计算器和大剂量指南在<60mg/dl范围内模拟的OBG百分比分别为20.8%和17.2%,在>200mg/dl范围内分别为13.8%和15.8%。所有大剂量指南满意度项目以及学习和使用便利性的平均得分和中位数得分分别为4.17和4.2(满分5.0)。

结论

基于碳水化合物范围选择的大剂量指南推荐与基于碳水化合物点估计的计算器基本相似,并且似乎被1型糖尿病胰岛素泵使用者高度接受。

相似文献

1
Bolus guide: a novel insulin bolus dosing decision support tool based on selection of carbohydrate ranges.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Jul 1;4(4):893-902. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400418.
2
A review of the "bolus guide," a new insulin bolus dosing support tool based on selection of carbohydrate ranges.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Jul 1;4(4):903-5. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400419.
6
Method for automatic adjustment of an insulin bolus calculator: in silico robustness evaluation under intra-day variability.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2015 Apr;119(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
7
Adherence to Insulin Pump Behaviors in Young Children With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jan;11(1):87-91. doi: 10.1177/1932296816658901. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
8
Development of a New Tool to Assess Bolus Calculation and Carbohydrate Estimation.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Mar;18(3):194-9. doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0292. Epub 2016 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
A Safe and Simple Algorithm for Adding and Adjusting Mealtime Insulin to Basal-Only Therapy.
Clin Diabetes. 2022 Fall;40(4):489-497. doi: 10.2337/cd21-0137.
2
A Randomized Controlled Study of an Insulin Dosing Application That Uses Recognition and Meal Bolus Estimations.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jan;11(1):43-49. doi: 10.1177/1932296816683409. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
4
Accuracy of Carbohydrate Counting in Adults.
Clin Diabetes. 2016 Jul;34(3):142-7. doi: 10.2337/diaclin.34.3.142.
5
Dietary strategies for adult type 1 diabetes in light of outcome evidence.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015 Mar;69(3):285-90. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2014.214. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
6
Common standards of basal insulin titration in type 2 diabetes.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 May 1;7(3):771-88. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700323.
7
Insulin bolusing software: the potential to optimize health outcomes in type 1 diabetes mellitus.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 May 1;7(3):646-52. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700309.
8
The current status of bolus calculator decision-support software.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Sep 1;6(5):990-4. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600501.
9
A review of the "bolus guide," a new insulin bolus dosing support tool based on selection of carbohydrate ranges.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Jul 1;4(4):903-5. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400419.

本文引用的文献

1
Many patients with Type 1 diabetes estimate their prandial insulin need inappropriately.
J Diabetes. 2010 Sep;2(3):194-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-0407.2010.00086.x.
4
How does treatment satisfaction work?: Modeling determinants of treatment satisfaction and preference.
Diabetes Care. 2009 Aug;32(8):1411-7. doi: 10.2337/dc08-2256. Epub 2009 May 26.
6
Impact of carbohydrate counting on glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jun;32(6):1014-6. doi: 10.2337/dc08-2068. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
7
Flexible eating and flexible insulin dosing in patients with diabetes: Results of an intensive self-management course.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008 Jun;80(3):439-43. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
8
The impact of non-model-related variability on blood glucose prediction.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007 Aug;9(4):363-71. doi: 10.1089/dia.2006.0039.
9
An evaluation of an insulin transfer programme delivered in a group setting.
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jul;16(7B):152-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01772.x.
10
Evaluation of glargine group-start sessions in patients with type 2 diabetes as a strategy to deliver the service.
Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Feb;61(2):329-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01190.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验