Tamatani S, Sasaki O, Koizumi T, Nishimaki K, Ito Y, Koike T, Takeuchi S, Tanaka R
Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Research Institute, Niigata University; Niigata, Japan -
Interv Neuroradiol. 2000 Jun 30;6(2):125-33. doi: 10.1177/159101990000600206. Epub 2001 May 15.
Fibrinolytic therapy for acute ischaemic stroke has been investigated in several clinical trials, with various protocols. This retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and limitation of local intra-arterial fibrinolytic therapy using urokinase (UK) in patients with acute middle cerebral artery occlusion. Fifty patients were treated with local intra-arterial fibrinolytic therapy within six hours after onset of symptoms. The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 17 (range, 6 to 28).Two hundred and forty thousand IU of UK was administered through a microcatheter for 20 minutes. When arterial recanalization was not achieved, a second or third infusion was performed. Maximum dosage of UK was 0.96 x 106 IU. Recanalization efficacy was evaluated at the end of fibrinolytic therapy and intracranial haemorrhage was assessed within 24 hours. Clinical outcome was evaluated three months after ictus with modified Rankin scale (RS). Thirty-nine patients (78%) obtained recanalization. Twenty-nine of 39 (74%) showed clinical improvement just after treatment. On the other hand, only 18% patients (2/11) who did not recanalize demonstrated improvement. Twenty-five of 50 (50%) patients recovered to RS score 0 or 1, however, only 28% of patients (5/18) with proximal M1 occlusion obtained good outcome and 39% of them (7/18) died. The mean time interval from onset to treatment did not affect outcome. The overall incidence of haemorrhagic event (HE) within 24 hours was 36%, however, 78% of patients with proximal M1 occlusion showed HE. Only one patient with HE clinically deteriorated. In conclusion, local intra-arterial fibrinolytic therapy could be a safe and effective method for acute middle cerebral artery occlusion, however, indication of this therapy for patients with proximal M1 occlusion should be carefully decided.
在多项临床试验中,采用了各种方案对急性缺血性卒中的纤溶疗法进行了研究。本回顾性研究旨在评估使用尿激酶(UK)进行局部动脉内纤溶疗法治疗急性大脑中动脉闭塞患者的疗效和局限性。50例患者在症状发作后6小时内接受了局部动脉内纤溶疗法。美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分中位数为17分(范围为6至28分)。通过微导管给予24万国际单位的UK,持续20分钟。当未实现动脉再通时,进行第二次或第三次输注。UK的最大剂量为0.96×10⁶国际单位。在纤溶治疗结束时评估再通疗效,并在24小时内评估颅内出血情况。在发病三个月后用改良Rankin量表(RS)评估临床结局。39例患者(78%)实现了再通。39例中的29例(74%)在治疗后即刻显示出临床改善。另一方面,未实现再通的患者中只有18%(2/11)表现出改善。50例患者中有25例(50%)恢复到RS评分为0或1,但在大脑中动脉M1段近端闭塞的患者中,只有28%(5/18)获得了良好结局,其中39%(7/18)死亡。从发病到治疗的平均时间间隔不影响结局。24小时内出血事件(HE)的总体发生率为36%,然而,大脑中动脉M1段近端闭塞的患者中有78%出现了HE。只有1例发生HE的患者临床病情恶化。总之,局部动脉内纤溶疗法可能是治疗急性大脑中动脉闭塞的一种安全有效的方法,然而,对于大脑中动脉M1段近端闭塞的患者,应谨慎决定是否采用这种疗法。