Refractive stability of LASIK with the Visx 20/20 excimer laser vs ZB5m phakic iol implantation in patients with high myopia (>-10.00 d): a 10-year retrospective study.

PURPOSE

To compare the long-term outcomes of LASIK and ZB5M phakic intraocular lens implantation (PIOL) (Domilens) for high myopia (>-10.00 diopters [D]).

METHODS

This long-term (10 years) follow-up retrospective interventional case series study included 126 eyes that underwent LASIK and 52 eyes that underwent ZB5M angle-supported PIOL implantation. Both groups of eyes were similar in terms of preoperative spherical equivalent refraction (SE), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and age.

RESULTS

Mean preoperative SE was -14.33 D in the LASIK group and -14.84 D in the PIOL group. At 10-year follow-up, mean postoperative SE was -1.47±2.00 D in the LASIK group and -1.01±1.36 D in the PIOL group (P=.21). In the LASIK group, 67% of eyes were within ±1.00 D of emmetropia at 2 years after surgery, compared to 42% at 10 years. In the PIOL group, 68% of eyes were within ±1.00 D of emmetropia 2 years after implantation compared to 53% at 10 years. In the LASIK group, 43.5% of eyes achieved UDVA of 20/40 or better 10 years after surgery compared to 67.9% in the PIOL group (P=.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The ZB5M angle-supported PIOL was shown to have better predictability and stability compared to LASIK over 10 years. However, reductions in endothelial cell count over time were observed in eyes with PIOLs.