Stavrakis Stavros, Madden George W, Stoner Julie A, Sivaram Chittur A
Cardiovascular Section, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Echocardiography. 2010 Oct;27(9):1141-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2010.01250.x.
Pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis is a potentially serious complication of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The optimal method for diagnosis of PV stenosis has not been established. We undertook a systematic review of the literature to investigate the diagnostic performance of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for the detection of PV stenosis after catheter ablation of AF.
We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of TEE for the detection of PV stenosis after catheter ablation of AF, compared to a reference standard of PV angiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or computed tomography (CT). Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS tool.
A total of seven studies that included 344 patients (1,344 PVs) met the selection criteria. Of these, three studies used PV angiography as the reference standard, while MRI and CT were used in two studies each. Compared to PV angiography, TEE had sensitivity between 82% and 100% and specificity between 98% and 100%. Compared to MRI, TEE sensitivity was 100% in both studies, while the specificity ranged between 98% and 99%. Compared to CT, TEE had sensitivity between 86% and 100% and specificity of 95%. Quality of the reviewed studies was somewhat limited by the retrospective design in most of the studies.
TEE has a high sensitivity and specificity in detecting PV stenosis. Given its wide availability and favorable side effect profile, these data suggest that TEE is very useful tool for the diagnosis of PV stenosis after catheter ablation of AF.
肺静脉(PV)狭窄是心房颤动(AF)导管消融潜在的严重并发症。PV狭窄的最佳诊断方法尚未确立。我们对文献进行了系统回顾,以研究经食管超声心动图(TEE)检测AF导管消融术后PV狭窄的诊断性能。
我们检索了MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库,查找评估TEE检测AF导管消融术后PV狭窄诊断性能的研究,并与PV血管造影、磁共振成像(MRI)或计算机断层扫描(CT)的参考标准进行比较。使用QUADAS工具评估研究质量。
共有7项研究纳入344例患者(1344条PV)符合入选标准。其中,3项研究使用PV血管造影作为参考标准,2项研究使用MRI,2项研究使用CT。与PV血管造影相比,TEE的敏感性在82%至100%之间,特异性在98%至100%之间。与MRI相比,两项研究中TEE的敏感性均为100%,而特异性在98%至99%之间。与CT相比,TEE的敏感性在86%至100%之间,特异性为95%。大多数研究的回顾性设计在一定程度上限制了所纳入研究的质量。
TEE在检测PV狭窄方面具有高敏感性和特异性。鉴于其广泛可得性和良好的副作用特征,这些数据表明TEE是AF导管消融术后PV狭窄诊断的非常有用的工具。